is "problematic" already a bright line, or all humans are flawed and it's challenging to say for any particular person/behavior when someone's disagreeableness exceeds a community standard?

@Moon
This is typically when they'll bray on about PARADOXOTOLERANCE despite Popper specifically saying "don't use this an an excuse to censor lmao" in his book.

Sometimes, when you point this out, they'll 180 on a dime and suddenly say that Popper is an old coot who didn't know anything. But his paradox which they learned from a three panel comic was "clear cut guidance" (lmao) not five minutes before.

So they entirely miss the part where a human, or group of humans, must decide where the line is and handle every corner case.

Follow

@r000t @Moon
I love the paradox of tolerance, because citing it unironically as an excuse for bad behavior is proof, that you are unable to comprehend even the most basic of philosophical concepts.

It is called PARADOX FFS!!! If they don't understand, that it says, that their intolerant behavior makes them intolerable by others, then they aren't an adult by any metric I can think of.

@LukeAlmighty @r000t @Moon they are just useful idiots of sociopaths of course they've never actually read a philosoper.

Arrow also said while perfect democracy is impossible he would still advocate for ranked choice because it's less bad. You don't see fedi folk reading past the first line either.
@LukeAlmighty @r000t @Moon I far prefer the non-paradox of intolerance.

I put down degenerates trying to ruin my society.
Bottom text.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.