It is an interesting test of ability to see things from another perspective.
But some statements are ambiguous, and others are simply facts when taken literally.
"Racism exists in America" only requires one racist to be true, so it should be 100% as stated.
However, "Government imposed racism exists in America" has been false for 50+ years if we talk about black victims, so it would be a zero, however government imposed affirmative action is racism too, so we now have 100%.
Framing!
I had a perception gap of 40% on that one, as I was focusing on what democrats do as opposed to what they say.
And what they do when having power is reflected in on campus sexual assaults, where they typically hamper the accused man's ability to defend himself.
I think staff and faculty at American universities is an acceptable proxy for democrats, as more that 90% of them indeed are democrats.
@viking @chris
Exactly why I chose it as an example. Because that was the one, where I felt the true difference between what I believe, what they believe, but most importantly, what they think they believe.
And because I knew how retarded they are on that one question, that was the smallest gap I got.
On the protection against false accusation, I was expecting their delusion to be deeper, and totally dismiss it as a problem.
@viking @chris
And don't worry, I had the same retardation problems with other questions.