That discourse was basically just about finding a new way to denigrate men as "dangerous" and nothing more. It was also a ploy by these women to get attention from men, either in the form of men insisting that they're not like that (male validation and attention) or making fun of them for their obviously-stupid ideas (vindication, "men are dangerous because they make fun of me on the computer"). The winning play was to not respond at all
@NEETzsche
Well, as someone who went through the kill all men and Me2, I believe, that the actual goal right now should be to spread the message, that this shit is broken.
Therefore, the winning move is to never let the bear go. Especially, since it hits right between our instinct to protect women (instinct stronger then our self preservation), and our instinct to form a family. You might never get a more impactful message, then this one.
And for people who do not take that question seriously, it STILL manages to enforce the womens irationality. So, even though, it was supposed to be an attack on men, I couldn't ever manage to construct a better argument for the other.
@YTFoidLover1488 @NEETzsche
Oh, I've never heard of the first one
modelviewculture.com/pieces/giveyourmoneytowomen-the-end-game-of-capitalism
also harassing homeless men on public transit for not sitting in a way that tends to crush their balls
m.youtube.com/watch?v=NQglZPVmoo8