@teto @LukeAlmighty

yeah, cuckservatives talk about how they ruined the rainbow, but the biggest damage they have done is to the word "Love".
beyond the fact that they commit sodomy, lets assume i participate in only straight hedonism, if i have sex with a different woman every week, i certainly wouldn't "Love" those women, i would barely even remember their name, nor would i actually know them on a personal level.

and if i had consistent sex with a single woman before marriage, you might also believe then THAT qualifies as "Love", but here is a question, what if she said she doesn't want to have sex anymore, well now you see the real nature of the "Love" you had, some in rare cases will be able to learn to Love, but it's often the case that the foundational connection was built on sex and lust, and when that is not present anymore you fail to connect, regardless if the other person makes a good connection or not, you fail this.

so more divorces happen, because hedonists are much more likely to cheat and commit adultery if they cannot fulfill themselves (also, marriages are now more about "me" than "us"), your foundational pillars shouldn't be built on lust, when the marriage is proposed then that foundation has been built solid already, and then you can participate, do not indulge too much of course else you risk corrupting the connection, which is why the mass adoption of contraceptives have been a disaster btw, i bet you could directly link the number of couples who use contraceptives and the chance of a failed relationship.

and then you figure out what the problem here is with gay "love", when you look at statistics, it's almost never a spiritual connection, even within that context there is constant sex with strangers, the most strongest of bonds can be described as "friends with benefits" really, if you look at a gay couple and have them abstain from any lust, it is basically just a platonic friendship.
they might be close but then they would be no different then 2 best friends, and intimacy becomes more about an attempt at the emulation of it because that is what they "should do", where they not in the modern society, became friends normally, and were not exposed to the current world, they would just be best friends, certainly not a connection to scoff at, but one that would not be gay.


this is also one of the reasons, that when they see 2 of the same sex portrayed as very close, they assume that it is gay, or some weird form of suggestion that they are gay, because they are both trained to see that a connection of that nature must also be sexual in nature, because in their mental landscape those are both inseparable, that is why that behaviour is so prevalent, not only do they want to affirm themselves, but theres also the reason that they geniuenly do not understand how you could get this close to a human, without wanting to get in their pants.

you as a man with a woman have natural instinct, the behaviour doesn't come from nurture, it comes from nature, which can be overridden with the correct "nurture".
sex is between a man and a woman, with the purpose of making children, of course, it is also a bonding ritual.
which is why you see gay couples just wanting to have kids, lets assume they don't do it to rape them, where does it come from?
the funny thing is that whatever it is, it is either emulation, or it is instinct, if you go with the idea that they are naturally born this way, why do they lack the instinct to be attracted to the other sex, but the instinct to have kids is still fully intact, even though both are connected for obvious reasons, even more specific, why is it also common to do so through IVF?

even if someone is fully straight, they are still trained on this mindset and idea of "Love", in a way this has been the most damaging thing the "sexual liberation movement" has done, i see this even in right-wing spaces, even "trad-caths" will still participate in this rotten mindset.

@themilkman @teto @LukeAlmighty you seriously underestimate the number of open marriages lol

@CapitalB @teto @LukeAlmighty open marriage is non-monogamous, it is adultery, adultery is awful for marriages for obvious reasons, if both partners agree to participate in open marriages it is obvious both partners are not that connected.

nobody who doesn't feel heavily pressured to, would agree to an open marriage if they loved their partner.

yeah i probably do underestimate it, it just makes me sad thinking about how common a lot of this stuff is.

@themilkman @LukeAlmighty @CapitalB theres a lot of upper class bavarian boomers I knew who lived apart but were still technically married. Don't think they did any actual adultery. Just permanently staying apart...

@teto @LukeAlmighty @CapitalB if they live apart they don't need to share a TV it's only the logical decision