I wonder... if I were to go to one of those protests/riots with a sign that just said "I'm tired of violence" how would I be perceived?
The message can easily be interpreted both as one against the rioting and violence that these protests spark, and we know that if you bad mouth the violence you'll suddenly be seen as anti-protests and pro-cops, and we know how that ends up. But the message can also be interpreted as being against the initial violence that supposedly sparked the current manifestations (ie death of Floyd).
So the question is, how would a rioting mob interpret it?

@alyx have you ever seen revolution without blood? people seem to forget quickly police dont have brain they take orders from government. This is war of government against their own people. This is what governments do. You stop it only by removing government. preferably not forming it ever again.

@Jack @alyx how is government working out for you LOL anarchy worked before...Anarchist Spain etc.

@Jack @alyx So you are Fascist. Thats who this war is against. Good luck It's billions of us against few of you.

@akeno @Jack
You have a really low bar for what counts as fascism friend. Please reconsider your life.

@alyx @Jack Yes I guess thats why thousands protest in your country soon millions. because government works LOL

@akeno @Jack
Let me know how Anarchist Spain is doing right now. Oh... that's right. There is no Anarchist Spain currently.

It seems governments still have a better track record of working.
Even feudalism probably has a better track record.

@adrint @alyx @Jack You all call "good track record" fact that people must do revolutions and die to have rights? WOW

@akeno @adrint @Jack
Bro, in Anarchy there is nothing and no one that can ensure your human rights are respected. The government is not the one that decides what your human rights are, but it is the only thing that can enforce and protect your rights once it recognizes them.

@colonelj @Jack @akeno @adrint
There's only so much you will ever be able to do to protect your rights yourself. There will always still be moments when you need things like an impartial justice system to handle disputes. To some degree you can protect your property, but who will you trust to rightfully divide that property if you ever get a divorce for example.

@alyx @colonelj @Jack @adrint Nonsense. would you read on anarchy already please? But to simplify Anarchy = LAW and freedom without force.
State = law and freedom with force
Force= no law, no freedom. Put things together. you must be rich if you like gov so much. So here we go again: "Until it happens to you" ....I hope soon.

LOL there is no such thing as anarcho-anything. Only anarchy.Otherwise you could come up even with anarcho-fascism

@akeno @colonelj @Jack @adrint
You cannot have law without a state power to enforce it. Without force you can't even ensure people respect any law. Seriously, why would I, or anyone else, do what you say in your vision of anarchy if there is no threat of force?