nsfw
re: nsfw
re: nsfw
@nerdman @galena
Trying to understand that first sentence, so if a gay person looks at a certain kind of porn, and they're aroused by it, that porn is gay?
Thing is, there can be a lot of things happening in that porn. A gay man can look at vagina-dick porn and be aroused by the guy in that equation. A straight guy will look at the same porn and be aroused by the girl in the porn. So then, is the porn straight or gay?
Categorizing porn by who gets aroused by it isn't that clear cut.
re: nsfw
@nerdman @galena
>Again, this is all "from what I've read", and any statistics can be considered as coming out of my ass.
At least they're coming out, and not going into your ass...
I used to have a good argument for the whole "traps are gay" thing. It basically came down to the idea that if the trap is passing enough, you'll never even need to ask yourself if "traps are gay" because you didn't notice in the first place. But if you do ask yourself if "traps are gay", then you noticed the trap and still went along with it, accepting the potential gayness.
But it's honestly just a meme anyway. And trap is not the same thing as transgender/transsexual. I usually think of trap as a very good crossdresser.
re: nsfw
re: nsfw
> that porn is gay?
It's gay to them. Like wantching that porn actor Buck whatever. It's a dude but has a 100% legit vag. As I understand it lots of gay men like watching Butch and a guy. But in the "traps are gay" view, Butch has a vagina so that's at least technically straight.
> Categorizing porn by who gets aroused by it isn't that clear cut.
Yet companies producing and hosting porn have to categorize it according to what the consumer sees it as. Buck whoever isn't going to sell a whole lot to straight consumers.
Again, this is all "from what I've read", and any statistics can be considered as coming out of my ass.