💀
@SystemSock
Artificially injecting sulfate particles into the air has long been proposed as a potential geoengineering solution to slow down or stop global warming, precisely because it helps block out some of the sun light and heat, and it's effect would be very fast (fast for geoengineering that is).
So yes, if there's a significant drop in this type of particle pollution, you'd notice it's effect a lot faster than the effect of a reduction in CO2 emissions.
@SystemSock@unexpected.singleuser.club
@SystemSock
I get it, and I expected you felt this way, but you put it as if they were twisting things and suddenly changing heir mind about how these things work, as to protect a narrative. I'm just pointing out that they are consistent with what they've always said about how these particular pollutants work.
For example "hottest summer on record" in Australia was nothing but bunk, as the climate "scientists" decided to retroactively change the data of previous years to make that year (2019 I think it was) the hottest on record.
It's a scam, and and has been since the 70s.
None of the proposed solutions solve anything, unless the "problem" is economic mobility, and small businesses.
My parents were promised an ice age.
I was promised acid rain by 2000, and half of France under water by 2010.
Where's the rising ocean, where's the CO2 acid rain?
Beachside properties still in high demand, last I checked.
No tangible evidence of any of this shit.
At this point, climate science has 0 credibility.
Show me cities under water, or fuck off with your quackery.
But of course, "by then it will be to late!"
Use teenagers to harangue people, cry wolf some more, that'll help.
You get what you deserve.
