@nosleep@neckbeard.xyz
This has to be staged... no way someone would actually get that many checks. Still hilarious

@alyx @nosleep
> no way someone would actually get that many checks
I do, use the Tor browser.

@mangeurdenuage @nosleep@neckbeard.xyz
>Tor
You do realize Tor is barely anything more than a meme now, right? Like, it doesn't actually protect you properly. Either do a decent VPN, or nothing. Tor doesn't help, and it's gonna constantly fuck you up with any website login.

@alyx @nosleep
>a decent VPN
>decent
That's a question of trust and you can't trust merchants. The best VPN you can have is one that you make yourself with a vps because at least you configured it but you can't trust the host to not snoop on you either.

>Tor doesn't help,
Tor gives you the same fingerprint as all the other tor browser thus blending in, VPNs do not in anyway do that.
Same with tails GNU/linux

>and it's gonna constantly fuck you up with any website login.
That is not Tor's fault but webdev faggots using google recaptcha while there are other solutions.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190615084741/https://kevv.net/you-probably-dont-need-recaptcha/

Recommended book: ISBN:-10: 0-12-088588-3
Follow

@mangeurdenuage @nosleep@neckbeard.xyz
I must be going blind, cause those 2 ISBNs look the same to me.

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0
@alyx @nosleep
>those 2 ISBNs look the same to me.
Enhance !
>ISBN:-10:
>ISBN-10:

@mangeurdenuage @nosleep@neckbeard.xyz
I'm getting the exact same bad search results. So yeah, they're functionally the same.
Don't know if you tried being a wisecrack, but it failed as far as I'm concerned.

duckduckgo.com/?q=ISBN:-10:+0-

duckduckgo.com/?q=ISBN-10:+0-1

@mangeurdenuage @nosleep@neckbeard.xyz

For future reference: putting ISBN-10: 0120885883 leads to a faster amazon find.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.