@alyx @crunklord420 You are witnessing a peaceful protest with fairly reasonable demands being violently suppressed after the liberal government invoked a law which had last been invoked during the World Wars and an event which involved kidnappings and murders. There are media shills at work lying and smearing the protesters as being various -ists and -phobes, while the police's own media shills justify their murder of an elderly woman by lying about it. The act which enables this brutality was passed to suppress a peaceful protest, in what amounted to a glorified temper tantrum by the government, whose will is being carried by worthless golems with a fetish for violence. These people would rather kill every single protester, peaceful or otherwise, than even consider speaking to one of them for even a millisecond. No amount of principles, morality, niceness or anything of the sort will stop them because liberals are monsters who hate you and want you dead for not thanking them when they fuck you. It follows then that any and all measures which can be used to stop them are equally valid, up to and including bringing kids to the protest. Even if they hadn't the social media shills would just make something up. All that matters is winning, because if they don't win they're already dead or worse. They'll be arrested, bank accounts frozen, the kids will be taken away from them. Thinking about morality doesn't matter when your enemy is fundamentally immoral, and moreover will use your morals against you.
Of course not. If one wins, his goal should be to purge his opposition and then implement his views. He will have an easy time with it because his opposition is busy fertilizing the fields or too far away to influence political affairs.
Bear in mind that the views here are "please let us make our own medical decisions, we're adults" and "governments shouldn't be allowed to rule by decree with the excuse of stopping one single SARS Influenza virus, which you've also failed to do".
Only three kinds of people would oppose these views, which are people whose worldview is colored by the media (which will support you once you control the media), empty-shell enforcers (who will support you if you're paying them) and the kind of people who genuinely believe that, yes, it is reasonable to turn the world into a security state to allegedly stop a singular virus (liberals). I'm better because I don't want a security state, except against people who do, and even then only because they are evil and have shown themselves to be the kind of person who will commit untold horrors against anyone who so much as mildly inconveniences them.