Follow
💀
Apparently I did manage to start an entire "who can be the most retard" thread. Yeah, I'll definitely not gonna go through it, because there's way too much to even read, and some of it is just too retarded.
For instance: "there's no way the crematoriums they used to burn the bodies could be X times more effective than modern crematoriums!!!".
Once again, just plain ol' common sense would tell you that today's crematoriums are designed to just burn one body at a time. But what modern large scale manufacturing taught us, is that when you increase the production by A LOT, you suddenly become incredibly more efficient, then when you build something one item at a time.
@alyx You got absolutely destroyed about this in that other thread and never came back, because your understanding of the holocaust comes from jewish hollywood movies. Mass-scale production and efficiency have nothing to do with it. The crematoriums in Auschwitz were also designed to burn single bodies at a time, and they had sub-standard fuel and conditions compared to what we have now. If you know so much, why don't you debate Mike Enoch or @borzoi
@Im_Jooming @alyx @borzoi This is next level stupid and indicative of someone who has never cooked a large piece of meat. You're constrained by evaporative cooling and exponentially rising fuel requirements as you scale up the oven size.
tl;dr that, faggot alyx.
tl;dr that, faggot alyx.
@dew_the_dew @Im_Jooming @alyx @borzoi Holohoaxers literally claim the human body, which is 70% water, can be used as crema fuel itself. Because we all know when you add more water to a fire, it always burns hotter!
@johnbudd1350 @dew_the_dew @Im_Jooming @alyx @borzoi Lampshades btw. Masturbation machines??? Wowwwzerrs!
@Im_Jooming @alyx @borzoi Don't forget thalf the crematoriums where down for maintenance and epairs a lot of the time.
- https://the-mad-pirate-prints.teemill.com/
@alyx
I think there are several questions that never seem to have a clear answer in order to sort that issue :
a) How many concentrations camps had crematororims ?
b) When did those crematorioums started functioning ?
c) What was the cremation rate of a single crematorioum ?
d) How many hours a day a single crematorioum was working ?
c) How many bodies were cremated in those crematorioums ?
I think the only reasonable way to attacking the issue is with a Fermi problem ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_problem ).
Ok, there were 44000 concentration camps built, so, lets say 10% of them had crematorioums, that leave us with 4400 camps with crematorioums and lets say each crematorioum house had 10 cremation chambers. Now lets say those crematorioums were active during 12 hours a day and the number of bodies were around 80% of the alleged 6000000 jews ( since many were buried directly on mass graves ), that leave us with 4800000 bodies. So, lets see...
4800000/(4400x10x365.25x12) = 0.024 bodies per hour or 1.49 bodies per minute which is still a ridiculous estimate compared to what a current cremation chamber can do, even when using such generous hypothesis. Of course, as with any Fermi Problem, the intention is not to achieve an accurate numbre but only get an idea of an estimate.
If we knew the actual answers to the questions then we could have an accurate number to compare to, until then, all we can do is try to estimate and see if they make sense.
I think there are several questions that never seem to have a clear answer in order to sort that issue :
a) How many concentrations camps had crematororims ?
b) When did those crematorioums started functioning ?
c) What was the cremation rate of a single crematorioum ?
d) How many hours a day a single crematorioum was working ?
c) How many bodies were cremated in those crematorioums ?
I think the only reasonable way to attacking the issue is with a Fermi problem ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_problem ).
Ok, there were 44000 concentration camps built, so, lets say 10% of them had crematorioums, that leave us with 4400 camps with crematorioums and lets say each crematorioum house had 10 cremation chambers. Now lets say those crematorioums were active during 12 hours a day and the number of bodies were around 80% of the alleged 6000000 jews ( since many were buried directly on mass graves ), that leave us with 4800000 bodies. So, lets see...
4800000/(4400x10x365.25x12) = 0.024 bodies per hour or 1.49 bodies per minute which is still a ridiculous estimate compared to what a current cremation chamber can do, even when using such generous hypothesis. Of course, as with any Fermi Problem, the intention is not to achieve an accurate numbre but only get an idea of an estimate.
If we knew the actual answers to the questions then we could have an accurate number to compare to, until then, all we can do is try to estimate and see if they make sense.
🔻🪂
@alyx You can't make your own Holocaust with hypothetical top-efficiency crematoriums. There's an official story describing places and methods.
@MechaSilvio @alyx My favs are the eagle and lion method, the holocoaster, and the masterbater.
@alyx You clearly don’t understand how surface area effects heat transfer, or you would know how fucking stupid the assumptions you are making are.
>this nigga believes the holocaust
hahahahah what a retard
Muh "economy of scale" when it comes to burning bodies
Hey Alex:
It's NOT a linear relationship between water content and energy required, you retarded faggot, listen here, you absolute anne frank ass retarded bitch, listen, HEY, pay attention, your energy density within an area is only as large as the vessel and the surface area to apply heat.
For example, because you need one you dumb cunt, you can bring 5 gallons of water in a metal bucket to a boil with a heating element, and you can bring 55 gallons of water to boil as well. The energy required to bring the larger vessel to boil is much greater than the smaller one due to the Heat transfer coefficient resulting in greater environmental loss.
The reason why we only burn bodies one at a time is because it's the most efficient way to do it.
Go back to retard school
Muh "economy of scale" when it comes to burning bodies
Hey Alex:
It's NOT a linear relationship between water content and energy required, you retarded faggot, listen here, you absolute anne frank ass retarded bitch, listen, HEY, pay attention, your energy density within an area is only as large as the vessel and the surface area to apply heat.
For example, because you need one you dumb cunt, you can bring 5 gallons of water in a metal bucket to a boil with a heating element, and you can bring 55 gallons of water to boil as well. The energy required to bring the larger vessel to boil is much greater than the smaller one due to the Heat transfer coefficient resulting in greater environmental loss.
The reason why we only burn bodies one at a time is because it's the most efficient way to do it.
Go back to retard school
NUH UH DUDE HOLOCAUST
Now that you put it that way, I change my mind, it happened, I was there when my 4 year old father was put into a freezer and broke into pieces right in front of me, I want reparations for the 6 bajillion and inherited trauma
Doc (WBS Edition) 
Look at the number of Jews worldwide pre- and post- WWII
Also simply doing this for German-occupied territories alone is somewhat enlightening
Also simply doing this for German-occupied territories alone is somewhat enlightening
That's not how this works...lol
And where did these crematoriums go? Why can't we tour them like can the shower/gas chamber? 🤣 lmao
And where did these crematoriums go? Why can't we tour them like can the shower/gas chamber? 🤣 lmao
Goalkeeper 
What if I told you every single holocaust book you have ever read can be traced back to ONE BOOK "A Year in Treblinka"
Here's a quote
>"It turned out that women burned easier than men. Accordingly, corpses of women were used as kindling for the fires."
Here's a quote
>"It turned out that women burned easier than men. Accordingly, corpses of women were used as kindling for the fires."
