C/W Racism and Anti-Blackness
@AshBeardguy @m0th
>"I am [...] socialist"
Yeah, I don't particularly care what type of socialist you are, but that admission from you automatically disqualifies you from being allowed to complain that people mistreat you.
I don't think you'd mind that people throw insults at a "nazi". In the same way I don't give a crap if an insult is thrown at a: communist, socialist, marxist, stalinist, fascist, neo-nazi, white supremacist, black supremacist, religious fanatic, antisemite, homophobe, rapist, pedophile, and the list goes on.
Grow a spine, find a worldview that doesn't lead to authoritarian dystopias, and stop being such a god damned ginger.
C/W Racism and Anti-Blackness
@FruitpilledPeachcel @m0th @AshBeardguy
He loves "sodomites" because his religious politics demands him he do.
I just don't hate people based on the circumstances of their birth, but on the basis of their dangerous ideologies and actions. If a gay person can live their life without breaking any laws, he's a ok. If a gay person attacks a child, the "faggot" word enters my vocabulary.
Me and "faggot butthurt mastodon users", we are not the same.
C/W Racism and Anti-Blackness
@PalePimp @FruitpilledPeachcel @m0th @AshBeardguy
God can hate "fags" all they want, I don't think they care.
C/W Racism and Anti-Blackness
@FruitpilledPeachcel @m0th @AshBeardguy
People give each other the flu all the time, either intentional or by accident, and we don't hang people over it. Most STDs are perfectly treatable, so there's no significant difference from those to any other disease people can catch.
Now, society does have exceptions for AIDS level STDs, where you need to disclose this fact before having sex with someone. If someone fails to disclose, that's a crime (in most civilized places). If after disclosing, people still want to have sex... well... if people consensually give each other STDs, that's not my business. I think they're being stupid, but if they want to get AIDS, and then abide by the rule of disclosing their condition to any other potential partner, then I simply do not care. There is no harm being caused there, because people who could potentially be harmed are informed, and the choice is in their hands.
As for "pop new STDs into existence", most known STDs exist since time immemorial. There are all kinds of mummies and ancient human remains that have been diagnosed to have had things like syphilis or gonorrhea. Monkeypox is not new either. The recent scare is just a slight mutation. And it's not even a proper STD, cause you can catch it by regular skin contact. But it got to act like a STD because that's when people are likely to get a maximum amount of skin to skin contact.
AIDS seems to be somewhat new in the grant scheme of things. But it didn't exactly pop into existence from gay people fucking each other. Last I checked AIDS originates from Africa, and maybe you're not aware, but most African... civilizations are about as fond of homosexuality as you seem to be.
>That is a public health risk.
All human interaction is a public health risk. But I doubt you'd deny people's right to walk out their door without wearing multi-layered face masks, surgery gloves, and who knows what else.
If you want to argue their behavior poses a burden on the medical resources, and as such their behavior should be restricted, that is an interesting argument to be had. But it's a far bigger discussion than just "muh gayz", that will eventually reach the issue of things like vaccinations. And I promise you, whatever your political position is, such a discussion is gonna lead into things you staunchly disagree with.
C/W Racism and Anti-Blackness
C/W Racism and Anti-Blackness