@p CALM YOUR TITS!
@p
> You do not know that the lasers are deadly.
They look pretty dangerous to me. I mean look at her stance. Look at that power pose. That lady means business. That's not a light show she's putting up. She has the stance of a superhero ready to fight her enemies.
>They are much more massive
I feel like you're exaggerating. I'm sure I've seen bigger.
>thus contain more energy
It's not about the amount of matter/energy they can contain according to Einstein's equations, but the fact that the laser tits seem to be generating energy out of thin air. There's no known mechanism for tits to convert matter into energy in the form of highly energetic coherent photon beams.
>Also they attacked a person, which tits can't do
To me it looks more like the lady flicked her chest a bit, and it made the tits jiggled. Hitting the person was just incidental.
>Actually, the connecting tissue strength[...] Either magic is holding them to that torso or they are made of something different.
As you can see, this lady is not wearing a bra. Why is that important? Studies revealed that bras actually have a negative effect on promoting strength in breast connective tissue. Basically, breast tissue acts like a muscle, which you need to exercise in order to fully support itself. This lady clearly adequately exercises her breasts, which allows the connecting tissue to be stronger than average. There's no magic here, just advanced science put into practice.
> Look at that power pose. That lady means business. That's not a light show she's putting up.
Same energy as Devo, and Devo likes light shows.
> I feel like you're exaggerating. I'm sure I've seen bigger.
They're the size of a building! The nipple probably weighed more than the person that the tits attacked.
> but the fact that the laser tits seem to be generating energy out of thin air.
You can't get energy from nothing.
> There's no known mechanism for tits to convert matter into energy in the form of highly energetic coherent photon beams.
what about cia tits
> To me it looks more like the lady flicked her chest a bit, and it made the tits jiggled.
We'll have to agree to disagree.
> This lady clearly adequately exercises her breasts, which allows the connecting tissue to be stronger than average.
There are some basic physical laws, though. Tall athletes blow out their knees more often because a linear increase in height gives a cubic increase in mass is cubic but only a quadratic increase in cartilage contact. This woman's tits defy math.
@p
>Same energy as Devo
I don't know what Devo is. 
>They're the size of a building!
See, clearly you're exaggerating. I feel like my assessment of them being... above average, is more factual and a reasonable thing to say.
>You can't get energy from nothing.
Precisely why I stated that they seem to be supernatural and denying the laws of thermodynamics. Even if they're not literal death lasers, there's still no biological mechanism that allows breast tissue to generate coherent beams of laser light. Even if they're light show lasers, normal breasts cannot generate those. As such, those tits need to be calmed.
>what about cia tits
CIA, FBI, NSA, and all the other letter agencies were hit by feminism and DEI practices in the last decade, which has severely nerfed tits within their departments, and eradicated all funding for tit research and development. The idea that CIA currently has the know how to create such tits is absurd. They do have tit shrink rays though... really dangerous ones. Avoid at all costs.
>We'll have to agree to disagree.
That's fair.
>This woman's tits defy math
Again, you're just grossly exaggerating their size, likely because you have some tit fetish. Which... I mean that's fine. It's a perfectly healthy fetish to have. But we need to be realistic about things in such discussions.
> I don't know what Devo is. :peepoShrug:
the fuck
"Whip It"? Go watch the music video for "Whip It".
> See, clearly you're exaggerating.
They would not fit on the balcony the lady is standing on. They are the size of small cottages.
> there's still no biological mechanism that allows breast tissue to generate coherent beams of laser light.
Conceivably, phosphorescence and crystallized milk solids could do this.
> CIA, FBI, NSA, and all the other letter agencies were hit by feminism and DEI practices in the last decade,
That doesn't stop the :glowinthedark::cia: from
. (Also it is bold to assume that the CIA was "hit by" something rather than that they engineered something.)> Again, you're just grossly exaggerating their size, likely because you have some tit fetish.
Okay, I *do* have a thing about tits but I don't have a thing about giant tits; exes have been usually A or B.
@p
>phosphorescence
I know there is some work being done in creating lasers with the help of bio phosphorescent dyes, but look at the thickness of those lasers. That's not lab equipment lasers. You definitely need some heavy equipment for that.
>crystallized milk solids
Excuse me, what?!
>bold to assume that the CIA was "hit by" something
Sure, once feminism took over, the letter agencies started doing the engineering too (which is why I mentioned the tit shrinking rays). But their agents are not immune from ideological crap.
>Okay, I *do* have a thing about tits
Case closed.
> You definitely need some heavy equipment for that.
It's powered by either the bike or the stretchy pants.
> Excuse me, what?!
Casein. I don't know if you could make a prism out of it but, you know.
> Sure, once feminism took over, the letter agencies started doing the engineering too
Okay, okay, tits discussion aside, go look up the work Bernays did for the tobacco companies before he went to the CIA as a founding member, hand-picked by Dulles. Feminism isn't an independent thing, it's a concept: people did this, and, like with Planned Parenthood, they did this by giving one reason that was hard to object to but with actual motivations that no one would have allowed, even the alleged beneficiaries. The short version is that these social movements were engineered and the architects all wrote down what they were doing and why for the benefit of like-minded people, and they didn't foresee that the internet would make it accessible to regular people. Near the end of the 19th century, when modernism took hold, there was this pernicious school of thought that said a society could be engineered "scientifically" (Marx sold his theories as scientific, and they were about as scientific as the Christian Science church), and this was coupled with a Malthusian nihilism that said that it *had* to be engineered, top-down, or we'd all die. This spread to the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, all of the big social catastrophes of the early to mid-20th century and by the 70s, they'd won, and that's who runs the world right now and they *still* say this insane megalomaniacal shit out loud because no one pays attention. No one gave a shit about Ukraine in 2014, but this time Victoria Nuland says out loud that she wants to give Russia an ongoing Afghanistan, suddenly everyone cares, the baizuo all have "Slava Ukraini" in the bios; someone asks what stopping the construction of Nordstream 2 is going to accomplish and she says "dead Europeans". Twitter didn't start swaying public opinion until they got in charge of it: the entire earth is astro-turfed by psychopaths. You think academia in the 1970s suddenly all falling into line with the CIA's--again, public--plan was an accident? Modern art? ( http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html ) The newspapers all following the same line? ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird )
So, no, feminism didn't "happen to" the CIA: it's been a prong in the fork since the CIA was created in the 50s, not long after the UN (which Rockefeller et al set up, in meetings with Eleanor Roosevelt and Truman and Dulles and the rest, meetings that they wrote down and we can now all read, as the parent organization of the IMF, World Bank, WTO, etc.). What do you think the ESG ratings are about? You think that the UN holding hearings about "Gamergate" came out of nowhere, or that Greta Thunberg is just so gosh-darn plucky that world leaders all had to listen to her?
But definitely don't tell anyone: it's all completely public, it's all verifiable, it's on the CIA's own goddamn website, but if you say it out loud, it makes you a "conspiracy theorist". No one will ever check if it's true, no one will ever read about it, no one pays attention, the international banks win again.
cia_award_for_excellence_in_journalism.jpg
kony2012psyop.jpeg
social-justice-is-wall-street.jpg
> As you can see, there's no literal death lasers shooting out of them.
1. You do not know that the lasers are deadly.
2. They are much more massive, and thus contain more energy, *unless* the square of the speed of light is different in the anime universe.
> but they don't exhibit any supernatural ability that defy the laws of thermodynamics.
Actually, the connecting tissue strength would need to hold more mass, and the mass grows as a cube (assuming similar density), but the amount of connective tissue would have increased only linearly (since they look similarly proportioned to a regular human). Either magic is holding them to that torso or they are made of something different, or they are literally magical.
Also they attacked a person, which tits can't do.