Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀 @alyx@gameliberty.club

I would laugh SOOOOO HARD.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aR7gOgnzbM

@icedquinn
Scientifically perfect toy for a dog to play fetch with.

@pasture @graf
All pasture is fake pasture

@coolboymew
Not that I remember

@sjw
Are people not aware that ALT+F4 still works?

@triodug
shut up meatboy. nobody cares.

@vib @vibot
rejected... oooff

@vib @vibot
something funny

@matrix
Looks like a regular Bob Chipman snack.

@nukie
Stop complaining, or I'll do it again.

@Synclair
I don't think suffering from depression at 6 years would be very useful, so I'll just take the $10 million.

@zleap@qoto.org @icedquinn
>I am sure nukes should be the final option though surely
At this point, that's basically a given.
It's just something that should be considered if:
1) you have a high degree of certainty that your enemy is gonna launch soon (and I'm talking about real certainty, not CIA promising Iraq has weapons of mass destruction).
2) there's a strategic possibility that by firing first you can somehow disable some of the enemy's infrastructure in a way that prevents them from launching 100% of their available nuclear armament. If you're both gonna fuck each other anyway, might as well try to make you & your allies less fucked up.

@icedquinn @zleap@qoto.org
>now its all economic and cultural warfare.
There's also proxy wars.

@zleap@qoto.org @icedquinn
You're mostly right. Thing is, you should always be willing to use nukes first. You just never say it out loud.