Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀 @alyx@gameliberty.club

@mushroom_soup
You girls have face creams made with fetus stem cells, so placenta shampoo is the least of my worries when it comes to woman made horrors beyond my comprehension.

@GinNig

You might not like it, but this is what peak programmer form looks like.

You might not like it, but this is what peak Vocaloid j-pop sounds like.

You might not like it, but this is what the peak fedi user form looks like.

@TheAncestor

@dave
About 2 decades ago I had a guy friend who made a joke saying he's a lesbian. I guess the joke's on him now.

@TheAncestor

@matrix
Goes to show how bullshit these things are if she's awake enough to film this.

@dave
Deathcel...

You might not like it, but this is what the peak male form looks like.

@sjw
Try seething. Maybe that will fix it.

@pasture
pics or it didn't happen

@Dave @Alex_Linder
You're a moron. Goodbye.

@Dave @Alex_Linder
>Why not compare the entire genome if it's not needed?
Your question makes no sense and it betrays your stupidity. Why do something if it's not needed? Of course no company will compare the entire genome if it's not needed, because comparing the entire genome costs time, money, and requires equipment a lot more complex than what they'll be using to test only specific genes.

>why let the company pick for you?
Each company likely has slightly different methods of both testing and the statistical analysis that is done afterwards, that can give different degrees of accuracy. Depending on that they choose what are the optimal things to test for to both get accurate results while also saving time, money, resources. If you don't like it how one company does things, you are a free customer, able to pick another company.

@Dave @Alex_Linder
I started this in good faith, but honestly, I'm not sure it's worth bothering anymore. I don't think you're able to comprehend that these things aren't as simple as comparing a couple of lines of text.

@mushroom_soup

@Dave @Alex_Linder
I don't know what you're on, I already said that these tests don't use full genome testing because there's no point in it, as it doesn't help with the analysis. If anything, it probably makes it harder to figure out who the father is if you compare all the genes.

@Dave @Alex_Linder
>now they rig them to make them 99.9% every time
That sounds like a drug fueled conspiracy theory. I will not look into it. I have better things to do.

As for explanations, the percentage represents the probability of someone being the parent or not. But because of how those particular bits of DNA they test work, you'll still get high results if you test a close relative of the father for example. Your screenshot mentions this too. If the actual father happens to be a brother, then you'll probably get something like that 97.8%.

There's also a possibility of course that a lower result in the past was due to imperfections in the testing itself or other errors that appear for whatever reason, that have been ironed out over the decades, so now it's more common to see either a 99.9% result or a clear cut "you're not the father" than something inconclusive.

@shibao
That's harder than it looks.