Show newer
@alyx @Orakel
>Let's actually be honest for a second here, there is no crime on earth that outrages people (especially men) as much as the rape of women (and if you knew even a bit about evolutionary psychology you'd even understand why that is)

The reason rape why it outrages men is because in terms of natural selection is constitutes cheating. Simply put the rules of the game are simple : you compete with other men for the attention of a woman, and once you beat the other suitors, you get to have sex ( and procreate ) with the lady. So rape, is just saying "fuck that ! I don't like competition ! I will just shit on other men, and fuck the girl the anyway! Take that you losers who play by the rules! hahahahah!". And just like with any sport or competition, it pisses the hell off of all the other guys trying to be "good sportsman" and follow the rules. And we all know how those cheating in a sport end up....

@TheMadPirate @Orakel
Yeah, basically a religion. While I'm not sure what their god figure would be, "The Patriarchy" is the invisible devil that works his evil magic to thwart women at all times.

@alyx @Orakel The reason the talking points is because the tenets of feminism are unfalsifiable hypothesis, i.e. a) Women are "oppressed" by "The Patriarchy ©️ " at all times, have always been and will always been under all circumstances , b) The want to "smash the Patriarchy ©️ " but at the same time keep the benefits the "oppressing system" gave to them and c) they want to "destroy the traditional gender roles" that "oppress" them but at the same time the demand those traditional gender roles to be fulfilled when is convenient for them.

Since the hypothesis are unfalsifiable, no amount of evidence that their conclusions contradict their premises will suffice to change their minds, they will just resort to a Special Pleading Fallacy and claim that the reason why it didn't work it is because the "oppressor" did something to stop them from achieving equality [of outcome].

@TheMadPirate @Orakel
The truly sad part is that every talking point listed in the post are lies perpetuated by feminists to cause outrage in people, which in turn will invest the feminist movement with power to provide a "fix". And although feminists have had power for decades, somehow none of those talking points changed one bit. Now there's two major possibilities either: a) nothing changed because feminists are that incompetent; or b) nothing changed, because those things listed were never a problem that happened IRL, and it was all a false narrative.

Let's actually be honest for a second here, there is no crime on earth that outrages people (especially men) as much as the rape of women (and if you knew even a bit about evolutionary psychology you'd even understand why that is). I doubt if even pedophiles get as much media attention as rapists do (unless if the pedos attacked girl probably). So if you're gonna start implying that these crimes aren't treated seriously enough, I can only assume that you're either lying about something or you're so ignorant that I'm gonna question if you should be allowed to vote.

@Orakel @GregorSamsa

Progressives : "Criminals are the victims of a capitalist normative society that oppresses them by not giving them equal access to education and jobs. Society is the culprit!. De-fund the police!"

Also Progressives : "Why aren't the police doing something about rapists! Why aren't they believing everything I say without physicals evidence and jailing them without bailout? Why isn't the police monitoring rapists 24/7 so they don't retaliate? Why aren't judges putting high bailout so the rapists can't get out of jail so easy? "

@ultem @matrix
I've read it before.
The real horror is when you realize the far-leftists basically want this. Well, not exactly the trough part, but the rest of "your children are not actually your own, and everybody gets to raise the child instead of you deciding what values you want to instill in them".

@anornymorse @ianbetteridge
The ignorance you're showing by thinking you're actually making a valid point with those screenshots is staggering.

This is not exactly how I remembered the show... is this that Mandela effect people talk about?

@coolboymew
>but we are not in love
That basically answered it for me. He should go for the lobsters. Considering they're no in a relationship, there's nothing stopping the roommate, aka mother of the children, from taking off and leaving the guy unable to ever see his children again.

@enigmatico
It's interesting to think about, but at the end of it all, it still feels like forced BS that doesn't really happen IRL.

@enigmatico
But wouldn't you need more than just a lack of the emotional/behavior side to be genderless? Like, physical aspects are part of gender too. Hair length, face shape, body shape etc., all these contribute. How would one be undifferentiated in these aspects too as opposed to androgynous? I'm guessing there might be a way, but I'm wondering if it would lead to basically looking alien instead of human.

@enigmatico
Now this makes me question what the definition of genderless would be then.
Yeah, I guess if in the case of being androgynous you can't distinguish the gender because a person has traits of both genders in similar amounts, then undifferentiated would be because a person doesn't have traits of either gender. But how would that work then?

@enigmatico
I would just like to know what exactly is the difference between androgynous and undifferentiated.

@NaiJi
I've accidentally typed sudo apt update a few times on Manjaro ever since I switched, but I've never combined commands like that.

@crunklord420
>upcoming superpowers
It seems like people's delusions are growing stronger.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.