@shitgrifter "You believe X, so do Y to be consistent" is completely valid irregardless of what the libtard thinks
@applejack this is incredibly reductive, for example, I don't strictly believe in X, there are other options other than Y, and following X strictly to the conclusion of Y may violate another principle, Z, or may inadvertently lead to outcomes that run counter to X. It's simply dumb to look at it as a strictly black and white scenario where only X and Y exist with no other context or externalities.
@shitgrifter The meme doesn't mention externalities or context, it implies the argument is wrong because the libtard doesn't believe it himself
Behind the Crooked Cross 
@applejack @shitgrifter This is not a counterargument
@applejack @Donald_McRonald nigger this isn't 2014, we are not in the sargon of akkad comment section on youtube. If you want to have a circlejerk about logical fallacies go back to the liberalists.
@applejack @shitgrifter Explain how it is
