@Fullmetal4456 @shitgrifter Alright, explain why

@applejack @applejack @shitgrifter

@AR-15 @shitgrifter That's not in any way true and you know it. You have your own brain, you can look at whether the point is valid or not, regardless of what the libtard's motives are

@applejack @AR-15 yes, and, using my brain, I can also rationalize and consider the various other externalities that invalidate the point. Furthermore, why do I have to have some kind of obligation to someone who is only willing to legitimize my beliefs in bad faith? Obviously if I thought my interests were served by a given policy or idea I would support that policy or idea and there would be no reason to invoke a strawman of my beliefs in bad faith.

@shitgrifter @applejack @AR-15 My counter argument:

Any shitlib who tries to gotcha me like in that meme is getting punched in the mouth

@RoyalJohnny242 @shitgrifter @applejack @AR-15 The "chad hominem" argument? That might too powerful against the libshits.

@RoyalJohnny242 @shitgrifter @applejack @AR-15 "You are wrong because you are gay"

"bottom text"

@Donald_McRonald @shitgrifter @applejack @AR-15 I actually outed a shitlib ex friend to his non-accepting family from undergrad after posting this meme on a retarded status of his

@RoyalJohnny242 @shitgrifter @applejack @AR-15 Did you ever see the Mister Metokur stream on stream.me where he suggests to a superchatter to out his cousin as a furfag homo by grabbing all of the guy's dildos and putting them around the wedding cake at someone's wedding?

I just thought of that

@Donald_McRonald @shitgrifter @applejack @AR-15 I don’t think I did.

The status that was posted was essentially him saying to read Leviticus and let in illegal immigrants because that’s what it says. Then I said “You know being homosexual you should be careful of encouraging others to read Leviticus.”

What’s funny is that his relatives liked all my comments while tearing into him.

@RoyalJohnny242 @Donald_McRonald @applejack @AR-15 >What’s funny is that his relatives liked all my comments while tearing into him.

fucking hell that's rough

@shitgrifter @Donald_McRonald @applejack @AR-15 Hey man the faggot violated White Jamahiriya shadowlaw years before I named this unknown supernatural force

@shitgrifter @AR-15 I don't have any disagreement with externalities or it being a bad point

>why do I have to have some kind of obligation
Nobody said that. It's internet memes, do what you want, I'm still going to continue being right

>bad faith
Irregardless of it, pointing out when someone is inconsistent is completely legitimate

@applejack @AR-15 pointing out inconsistencies kind of stops being legitimate if you do it through "illegitimate" means, I.e, concern trolling. Shitlibs are obviously not nationalists and obviously do not give a shit about nationalism, and in fact, in every other scenario would demand your head on a stick for even approaching nationalist ideas. There is absolutely nothing legitimate about bad faith concern trolling.

@shitgrifter @AR-15 No, it doesn't. A point is true or false, irregardless of what the libtard making it thinks

@applejack @shitgrifter @AR-15 Yet you are not obligated to engage if the shitlib themselves don't even believe the point they are making, otherwise you are allowing your enemy to waste your time.

@shitgrifter @applejack @AR-15 Also they don't even believe that a nationalist should support Ukraine. It's not a libtard pointing out a legitimate inconsistency, it is just lying.

@applejack @AR-15 also, if you don't have any disagreement on the point of externalities or it being a bad point, doesn't that kind of undermine the idea of it being a legitimate point on its face?

@shitgrifter @AR-15 It's not a legitimate point. I don't have a problem with making fun of it. I have a problem with implying it's wrong just because the libtard is applying logic he doesn't accept himself

@applejack @shitgrifter @AR-15 You are wrong though

@applejack @AR-15 @shitgrifter If someone is arguing in bad faith then you are under no obligation to engage them, therefor pointing out the absurdity of arguing something in such bad faith is far more effective at undermining their point than pretending they are acting in good faith

@Donald_McRonald @AR-15 @shitgrifter You're not under any obligation to do anything, nobody said that

They're libtards, pointing out they do it in bad faith isn't undermining them

Making an actual point would undermine them. And you have so many options with such a retarded point

@applejack @AR-15 @shitgrifter This is a specific angle of attack that can be countered by simply saying, "You don't even believe that, you are talking out of your ass"

That is an actual fucking point, and it is the most effective way to shut them down

@applejack @shitgrifter Yes it is true retard. Someone who has no principles and only sees them as a weakness to exploit has no business telling me how to act to live out mine. Even more so when their sole purpose in life is to kill me and rape my children.

I will now tap the sign.

@AR-15 @shitgrifter Refusing to reflect on a legitimate point from an enemy just makes you weaker. The other stuff I don't disagree with

@applejack @shitgrifter Enemies by definition don't have legitimate points.

@applejack @shitgrifter If their points were legitimate and compelling, they'd join my side.

@AR-15 @shitgrifter The original version of the meme was "jesus said a bunch of hippy shit, so if you follow jesus you should believe it", which is legitimate and compelling

@applejack @shitgrifter It's clearly not, because the people saying it don't follow Jesus. If they aren't compelled by their own argument then why should I be.

@AR-15 @applejack this, there's absolutely no reason to be compelled to engage arguments that don't even convince the people who make them

@shitgrifter @AR-15 @applejack Very few people are convinced by precise arguments and logic. Rhetoric is far more important than dialectic. You cannot use dialectic to counter a rhetorical argument and you will lose every time you try.

tl;dr: If the enemy comes at you with wordplay and trickery you don't refute it you call them a lying nigger and draw them as soyjak. Easy.

@applejack @AR-15 @shitgrifter The libtard in that meme does not even believe that jesus actually said that hippie shit or that he meant what the libtard said he meant, it is not compelling

@applejack @AR-15 @shitgrifter 1) Jesus called the Jews who refused to follow him the spawn of Satan and to kill pedophiles, so by no means was Jesus a hippy
2) NATO does not operate on nationalist principles and in fact actively works to undermine nationalism so Russia destroying/weakening NATO is a good thing for nationalists.

@applejack @AR-15 @shitgrifter No
It isn't

@AR-15 @applejack @shitgrifter youtube.com/watch?v=wlgN3gM6ZVc

@AR-15 @applejack @shitgrifter Napoleon was /retardpilled/, knew of the seductive shortcomings of words.

@applejack @AR-15 definitionally insencere points are not legitimate, if anything it makes you look weaker when they turned your principles on their head to get you doing what they want. It's fucking stupid.

@applejack @AR-15 @shitgrifter No, refusing to call out a liar for acting in complete bad faith makes you look weak

@AR-15 @applejack @shitgrifter

@SNEK @applejack @shitgrifter It adds flavor. I photoshop it onto my memes deliberately.

@AR-15 @applejack @shitgrifter

@applejack @AR-15 @shitgrifter >That's not in any way true and you know it.

Are you suggesting he is arguing in bad faith? According to your own logic that isn't even relevant. Why bring this up?

Now you're arguing in bad faith, by accusing him of arguing in bad faith, in bad faith.

@Donald_McRonald @AR-15 @shitgrifter I said nothing about bad faith. He obviously knows reality doesn't distort according to what a libtard thinks

@applejack @AR-15 @shitgrifter You just said that he knows it's not true but yet he argued it, that means you were accusing him of bad faith, now you're lying and trying to wriggle out of it