@shitgrifter "You believe X, so do Y to be consistent" is completely valid irregardless of what the libtard thinks
@applejack this is incredibly reductive, for example, I don't strictly believe in X, there are other options other than Y, and following X strictly to the conclusion of Y may violate another principle, Z, or may inadvertently lead to outcomes that run counter to X. It's simply dumb to look at it as a strictly black and white scenario where only X and Y exist with no other context or externalities.
@shitgrifter The meme doesn't mention externalities or context, it implies the argument is wrong because the libtard doesn't believe it himself
@applejack @shitgrifter That makes it a bad faith argument and therefore wrong.
@AR-15 @shitgrifter That's not in any way true and you know it. You have your own brain, you can look at whether the point is valid or not, regardless of what the libtard's motives are
Behind the Crooked Cross 
@applejack @AR-15 @shitgrifter If someone is arguing in bad faith then you are under no obligation to engage them, therefor pointing out the absurdity of arguing something in such bad faith is far more effective at undermining their point than pretending they are acting in good faith
Follow
@Donald_McRonald @AR-15 @shitgrifter You're not under any obligation to do anything, nobody said that
They're libtards, pointing out they do it in bad faith isn't undermining them
Making an actual point would undermine them. And you have so many options with such a retarded point
That is an actual fucking point, and it is the most effective way to shut them down