applejack @applejack@gameliberty.club

@Samhydeigger It's a relatively small thing tbh. It's not that people like gay marriage now it's just that fags have much insaner shit going on

@miria But ask them what the abuse is and they can't answer it. They act like it's some metaphysical moral truth instead of any care/harm dynamic.

@Marko Where's an actual source for this? Trying to find it shows nothing.

@matrix
[aria-label="Verified account"] path{
color: yellow;
d: path("M15,12H9.78L7.5,15l-2.26-3H0l2.7-4L0,4h5.3l2.2-4l2.34,4H15l-2.56,4L15,12z");
}

@JoeBiden Fake

@mushroom_soup @salt Women don't need to earn money, they shouldn't be having kids if they are, and it's fine if the man is older. Girls are natural mothers, that's why little girls play with dolls, and you'd be taught. They were fine mothers in the past way younger than 20.

@salt
>While pregnancies from sex between first cousins do carry a small risk of birth defects, this risk is often exaggerated:[406] The risk is 5–6% (similar to that of a 40-year-old woman giving birth),[406][407] compared with a baseline risk of 3–4%.[407]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_misconceptions#Human_sexuality

We ban based cousin marriage but not hags breeding, why? That's not including any social problems either

@Eris @xxshtxx @sapphire @mushroom_soup @salt @stevejail @andreas@neckbeard.xyz @Angry_Norman @Svantovit @nonetrix @Ricotta Jesus Christ the amount of seethe. 300 messages of "I'm not having this discussion" which you're so invested in you bother to keep posting but are COMPLETELY unable to actually reply in any meaningful way. Jesus fuck it's pathetic

@sapphire @andreas@neckbeard.xyz @Eris @Ricotta @xxshtxx @Svantovit @stevejail @salt @nonetrix @mushroom_soup You know nature made a pretty objective and accurate way to measure this. It's called "if it fits, it fits".

@eTerrorist @josh Wrong. It's always been normal

@lichelordgodfrey @josh @eTerrorist If it was true instead of just puritan sampling bias it should be treated as a disease rather than normal

The continued reduction in the age of onset of puberty should not be treated as a biological anomaly. It is likely that some 20 000 years ago, humans had already evolved to experience menarche at around 12 years and at present many countries are moving back to this position.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2465479/

What’s really interesting, though, is that this getting of periods when you’re sixteen is not the archetypal human state of nature either. It was kind of a blip that happened at the beginning of modern times—a retardation that followed a deterioration of living conditions even as the march of human progress achieved lots of impressive milestones.
https://www.lastwordonnothing.com/2018/01/02/the-historically-slippery-age-of-puberty/

@Samhydeigger I mainly just like him looking casual or happy

@matrix It's not explaining the reason behind it, which is that pregnancy is a bigger deal for women than an ejaculation is for men. So they're more picky, it's not something they're "meant" to do.

There is no evolutionary reason for women not to have a cuckharem, or having a bunch of kids with strangers while they get child support and gibs from the state.

It's a failure of men for not keeping women in line that they are like this. They're larger children. They don't know what's good for them.

@Emperor1 @RikaDerufu So what's the purpose? I posted the best explanation we have, which is the sexually antagonistic theory. Female genes disable male genes by making them essentially infertile, literally sabotaging them.

@Emperor1 @RikaDerufu
That's wrong. Exaptation means the utility of a trait changes to serve a different purpose, like bird feathers adapting from warmth to flight.

Every trait starts off because of a mutation, that's at the core of the theory, but selection pressures change the gene frequencies around.

"Selection pressures" means replication probability, which means copies of genes within yourself or your kin. If you have any other method of selection, go pick up your Nobel.

@Emperor1 @Marko "Somebody" won't change much but make a talking point against us. Positive change won't ever come from the system, but any action against it has to be collective.

@Emperor1 @LukeAlmighty @Marko Well, it's a conservative term too

@Emperor1 @LukeAlmighty @Marko "Muslim" is an inadequate PC euphemism for a shitskin sandnigger arab