@CaptainFuggetaboutit What?
@Halo So a karma system
@tengumatingpress Denial?
@shitgrifter The proper Latin version of it is "Kænugarður" btw
@shitgrifter Remember when everyone called it Corona and they wanted to change the name of it to Covid, we said no, but then everyone got PsyOped into it anyway
@crunklord420 He then reverted it. Hasn't said why as far as I can see
https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/commit/60f67ccb35250f4bb9598359ac8b11e5efef4358
@LouisConde At least the creepy lusting over Ukrainian refugee wives isn't this bad
@eternalclassic People are calling her "The Koshka of Moskva", she already glassed 10 bacon farms
@LouisConde Expecting English to be capable of having accurate transliterations of anything is dead before it starts ![]()
@Insomnolant @RoyalJohnny242 I'm not either, I just dislike it when people try and have their cake and eat it
I think there are pragmatics with banning shit, but something as basic as a DNS blacklist and prosecuting companies like PH would only be good, especially in preventing kids from accessing it and getting rid of some of the monstrous actors in it, but I'll admit that's anti-Free Speech
@Insomnolant @RoyalJohnny242 I'm not entirely clear why everyone is taking this from an exclusively American legal context anyway
A "freedom to speak" is a general concept
Not like you'll change your view to X, Y, Z not being Free Speech if/when they become illegal in the US anyway, since that's clearly retarded
@RoyalJohnny242 You responded to me as if I said something you disagreed with
@Insomnolant @RoyalJohnny242 And the US had and has blasphemy laws too, despite literally saying "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
They're just not very consistent
By the exact same logic you can blasphemy is not Free Speech, and at that point you're very clearly not talking about the same concept as anyone else
@RoyalJohnny242 Sure, and that's a legitimate view, just don't then also pretend to like Free Speech
@DrRyanSkelton @rlier23 @Shizu Nigger, they quite literally wrote "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
@mac_ack @graf @Shizu You're not allowed to make that movie with a certain plot, that's not speech
You're not allowed to make a middle finger, that's not speech
You're not allowed to post racist memes, images, infographics, that's not speech
You're not allowed to post swastikas and pepes, that's not speech
You're not allowed to buy this book, movie, song, article, buying stuff isn't speaking
You're not allowed to access this website, downloading a webpage isn't talking or typing
You're retarded
I don't really care
Genuinely, what is your point? Blasphemy isn't speech? Actually, extend this, when you get arrested on the net for talking about jews, that stops being Free Speech, ye?
@DrRyanSkelton @graf @Shizu And they were struck down because they were deemed unconstitutional
It quote literally says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", they're just contradictory
Genuinely, what are you thinking? You're trying to make the point that blasphemy isn't speech or what?