@PinochetsCommieCopter I still don't think it's his fault this happened unless I'm missing something. The chick who loaded the gun was a blue hair dyke that was incompetent as fuck and fled when it happened.

@beardalaxy he hired the dyke and everyone knows you supposed to check any gun you are handed no matter what, so still his fault
@PinochetsCommieCopter @beardalaxy Baldwin's fault. Not just once, but TWICE. His production and his role as an actor. Labor troubles, and his crew was shooting at cans and stuff. And then he skipped personal due diligence.

An anti-gun activist should be greatly concerned with everyone's safety on set, but he wasn't. His budget came first. Which means he's not anti-gun. Gee, I wonder (((who))) his masters are??
Follow

@1967GTO @PinochetsCommieCopter you think anti-gun activists know ANYTHING about guns? Lmao. Stands to reason they would be trusting someone who says that they do. These are the kinds of people who call AR-15s "fully automatic assault rifles."

@beardalaxy @PinochetsCommieCopter As an actor, he was familiar with Hollywood armorers. Counting Rust, he filmed a dozen movies in which he handled guns. And most of them were *after* the mishap on the set of The Crow. You mean to tell me in all that time not one person ever taught him the common sense rules of handling a firearm?

As the producer, it was his responsibility. If his star (that's Alec Baldwin) told the producer (that's Alec Baldwin) that he knew Firearm Safety and didn't need no stinkin' training, who gets the blame?

Anti-gun activists constantly portray inanimate firearms as dangerous and unpredictable. Simple assurances could never negate that. They'd want to see for themselves that it's actually not loaded.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.