Anglin has stated women should be married off at that age. I feel comfortable confirming that without a direct quote.

RT: https://nicecrew.digital/objects/4bb5c834-fa23-4231-a649-3708e05d1670
Yeah cause he wants to lay pipe in 14 year olds
@doctorsex His point is women need to be married off to start having kids once they are fertile. That's a different thing than hedonistic sex.

But, I've engaged with this discussion as much as it made sense to.
Every single retard who has made the "marriage (for the purpose of procreation (sex)) ASAP" has made it abundantly clear time and time again that the actually have no idea how fertility works but yeah I'm sure it's different this time because the guy saying it hates jews enough or whatever
I love how they always do "its not for sex but procreation" do these niggas not know how it works?
@transgrammaractivist @doctorsex An age of consent of 16 seems reasonable for me policy-wise. People are uncomfortable with anything lower these days. I would ask once a woman hits high school and the breasts fill out, what magically changes between 14 and 16 and 16 to 18 to make the idea of courtship and marriage tenable. But 16 is a reasonable compromise, if nothing else to stop the bullshit "pedo" retorts.

Of course, in this Jewed out Satanic hellhole, the entire discussion of lowering the age of consent would not be had with good intent, so I wouldn't support lowering it without getting rid of the Jews. (My understanding, without looking it up, is it would not need to be lowered at all to reach 16 in many cases, both here and abroad, but I don't care to look it up.)

The whole "you're a pedophile" thing for being attracted to a sexually mature female is retarded. It could hardly be argued if more women were becoming committed wives at 14 and starting to have kids, we would not, in fact, get more children being born. The whole stigma just conveniently happens to result in fewer children being born.

The "you want to fuck kids" line is just making a cheap shot with ill intent about a discussion that deserves to be had about why "we" decided having kids in the prime of fertility was a bad idea.
@DailyStormerDigest @transgrammaractivist @doctorsex >An age of consent of 16 seems reasonable for me policy-wise
It's already 18. Spending energy talking about lowering it by 2 years immediately brings your motives into question.
@John_Darksoul @transgrammaractivist @doctorsex I have been responding this entire time to people twisting Anglin's words about marrying women off young. I am not the one spending energy here.

But a 16 year old is entirely sexually mature. Deal with it and get over it. Other men should not be denied access to fertile wives because you have a hang-up.
Follow

@DailyStormerDigest @transgrammaractivist @doctorsex @John_Darksoul sexually mature but still vulnerable. That's the whole idea of age of consent... The attempt to prevent young people being taken advantage of. It's why aoc is usually a sliding scale depending on the ages of both people. Anyone who solely thinks it is about sexual development is missing the point entirely.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.