Follow

nintendo should have removed content from mkw, had the game set at $60, and then added that content back in for $20 3 months later.
that's WHAT EVERYONE ELSE DOES AND THEY GET WAY LESS SHIT FOR IT.

@beardalaxy The problem is that the 20 dollar DLCs are expected to happen despite the high price tag.

@Jens_Rasmussen even then, if you're getting the relative amount of content/playtime from an $80 game that you would with a $60 game + a $20 DLC doesn't that still make it worth it? a $20 DLC for an $80 game would just be extra stuff beyond that.

you're gonna' get less sales selling an $80 video game than you would with a $60 game and $20 DLC, naturally not everyone will be able to pay that $80 right away or want to commit to that and the $20 dlc later feels a lot more approachable. i think that's a better talking point than just saying that an $80 game isn't worth the money though because it very well could be worth the money if it's that good. theoretically, of course.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.