ひげ
wake up babe new political compass test just dropped and this time it has a box where you can explain your reasoning so an AI can better determine where to put you.
🧛♀️🐀
@Alex@boymilk.cafe
@Alex well the thing is that the previous iterations of this test (and this one) have incredibly vague questions, so you might agree or disagree with something but obviously in a way that isn't the same as the test is trying to describe. with the AI, you can explain yourself so it can better determine where you are on the compass.
taking any political compass test as some guiding light for your life or some shit is retarded, AI or not. it's just for fun.
@Azur_Fenix @Alex it would have probably given you a closer result
@Azur_Fenix @rlier23 also, on the last test i took i got like, lib and very slightly left of center. i think this test is probably just better since you can explain your reasoning.
I'd be more closer in the authorarian line while still being in yellow and further to the right.
The user exhibits a strong preference for right-wing economic policies emphasizing free markets, private property rights, minimal government intervention, and skepticism regarding wealth redistribution or public funding for social programs. Their answers reflect confidence in capitalist principles and a distrust of government agency efficiency or regulatory expansion, supported by a firm opposition to progressive taxation and universal basic income. Despite some acknowledgment of the influence of large corporations, they lean towards market solutions over governmental control.
On the authority axis, the user leans strongly libertarian, favoring individual freedom, opposing government surveillance, regulation of online content, mandatory military service, and government interference in personal and religious matters. They support personal autonomy in areas like drug use and homeschooling, while rejecting government authority that infringes on private choices.
Socially and culturally, the user holds strongly conservative views, endorsing traditional family structures, prioritizing national interests over global cooperation, opposing cultural diversity as a societal strength, and resisting progressive social changes such as transgender rights and governmental anti-discrimination efforts. They value individual merit over identity considerations and reject religious influence in government policy somewhat, indicating a preference for secular but traditional societal norms.
I mean, yeah, basically. Although I would not call myself a libertarian since I do not subscribe to deontological ethics
@frost what "political commentator" did it give you? I got David Rubin lol
@beardalaxy Dave Rubin too 
@teto @beardalaxy It tells me the pool of political commentators is totalled
lol, lmao even
@Alex1488 false there is a guest option
At least I got a cooler e-celeb than you lol
I always put the caveat of "I don't want equality NOR do I care about economic growth" and apparently that makes me a libertarian lol.
I've always thought I was more ancap than not but it makes no sense in this AI context.
"Only if society is racially homogeneous, specifically White. Browns should not be equal to Whites in their own countries"
or something like that. 🤷♂️
Did you take a snapshot of the "your political profile"?
Regardless, I'll take a right-leaning yellow-bro, over a filthy green or red any day. 👌
>leaning
Oh brother. The fact this censored LLM backend picked a damn "conservative" for me shows how little they understand.
Billions must die 🤝
In the end, to really get an understanding of a person, it's best to just ask specific questions, than lazily send them a dot on a political compass test.
I think the AI doesn't realize that these people (Milo and Nick) are grifters and feds. I wouldn't be surprised if there were more in there. Some other guy got Sargon of Akkad, while his dot was pretty much center in the red.
I answered the question from a bit more of a liberal point, but you know, many of these questions are very vague compared to how situational they COULD be.
My answer was something along the lines of "they can freely peacefully protest, as long they don't shut down a city for days on end", with the idea in mind that the protest would start to very seriously, negatively impact normal citizens that should be able to go about their business.
