@LittleTom I don't understand why people are praising this game. I beat it and the gameplay is just dark souls but easier. It's not scary. The plot is total nonsense. Like, it's trying to give you the impression that it's deep by being "vague", but it's just utter nonsense. There is no reasonable way that anyone can piece together a coherent story from it.

@Elliptica @LittleTom you have to at least watch the other endings, it makes a lot more sense if you do so. apparently there is a lot more story given in NG+ as well. i understand the plot pretty well. whether it is a good plot or not is up for debate.

@beardalaxy @LittleTom I only played through the first story, which was nonsense. I assumed the game play would be the same for the other versions, minus the endings, or that it wouldn't matter much.

Still, it seems silly to not put something good up front. Like, that convinced me to not play the rest.

@Elliptica @LittleTom yeah it'll probably work for some people and not for others, I can tell. If I got In Water for my first SH2 ending I probably wouldn't have been that interested in playing it again either lol so I get it.

@beardalaxy @Elliptica A shitload of the plot (silent hill f) is told through new bits and notes that are only available in ng+ playthroughs as far as I can tell. LIke a LOT of it is in notes, not just the new endings.
Follow

@LittleTom @Elliptica I just watched the cutscenes and I'll be doing another playthrough soon, but I was able to mostly piece it together through those alone tbh. The journal entries I'm guessing just add a lot of context and cement things.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.