@wowaname the website has like nothing on it right now so it won't matter
@bonkmaykr then why have the click-through disclaimer trying to treat us like lesser web citizens
@wowaname obviously because it's not finished?
why do you take this so personally? Just ignore the warning, no need to be a massive prick.
@bonkmaykr
>ignore the warning
nah, i'll do fine shoveling your body into the same pit of hell designated to all other webshits and pajeets with your anti-user mentality.
>ignore the warning
nah, i'll do fine shoveling your body into the same pit of hell designated to all other webshits and pajeets with your anti-user mentality.
@wowaname @bonkmaykr Does this mean that I should stop using JavaScript to load navigation bars?
@xianc78 @bonkmaykr you can do that with pure css
@wowaname @bonkmaykr I'm talking about having a JavaScript file for writing the links for the sites navigation. So I can just edit the JS file instead of each page.
I know you could also do that with server-side scripting or a static-site generator, but sometimes I just want to get things done and have it run on any webserver.
@xianc78 @bonkmaykr i get things done with a makefile, version control, and rsync. it's easy to avoid client-side scripting and to generate websites.
>using JavaScript is not in-and-of-itself "anti-user",
oh yeah running unaudited software on an opt-out basis instead of being given the option to install and execute it is totally pro-user. yeah i'm sure you're an Expert Programmer, faggot.