Crazy how wanting your country to be isolationist is a controversial take.

Oh, you don't want endless wars that serve no benefit to the people of America? Nazi!

Is that what Adolf wanted for Germany, just to be left alone?
Follow

@MaleGoddess Considering he invaded several countries, I'm guessing: no.

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0
@coded_artist
He invaded Poland, which was part of Germany, but was given up in the Treaty of Versailles.

Then the British were staging to invade Sweden, so Germany took Denmark and Norway so that the Bri'ish couldn't launch an attack from those countries.

Alright, looking into it, I guess Uncle Adolf wasn't very isolationist. Or maybe he was... They weren't invading these other counties to meddle in their affairs, the Germans were taking those countries to protect Germany.

I would support the US invading Mexico if we were taking Mexico to become a US territory and keeping their resources.
I would not support the US invading New Zealand or some other crazy place that serves no purpose, just to do a "regime change" or Operation Zealand Freedom, and it benefit the people in the US in no way whatsoever.
@MaleGoddess @coded_artist American ignorance will never cease to amaze me. What do they teach you at school?
@riz @coded_artist
How is it ignorance?
Germany invaded other countries for the betterment of Germany.

America invades other countries for the betterment of Israel.

I'd much rather invade other countries for conquest rather than pleasing jews.
@MaleGoddess @coded_artist Clearly your family hasn't suffered the war, there's a reason why the entirety of Europe (excluding the Russian barbarians) decided war isn't worth pursuing after that conflict. Those of us whose grandparents, or even great grandparents, suffered through it know it all too well but I assure you the government having more resources isn't worth dying a horrible death in a foreign country and adding foreign subjects to your nation is just a massive burden in the long run anyway. I'll remind you that when your country decided to invade middle-eastern shitholes for oil, it only resulted in towelheads getting buttmad and doing terrorist acts, not only in America, but all over the Western world.
@riz @coded_artist
The US invasion of Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with oil.
It made very few, already rich people more rich.
Supposedly for the benefit of Israel, but I can't say for certain. It's probably true though. I do know that it wasn't for oil, wasn't for WMDs, and wasn't for the benefit of Iraqi people.

Wars make money for the military industrial complex. The MIC contributes to politicians and top military brass in the form of legal and illegal bribes.
Going to war and staying at war benefit the MIC. The MIC pays well to politicians and military leadership that supports endless wars.

Occupying Iraq and Afghanistan for nearly 20 years did nothing to benefit the vast majority of Americans.

What I'm saying is that going to war for conquest, acquiring new lands, and increasing resources for your country > going to war for 2 decades and having nothing tangible in return.
Both Iraq and Afghanistan are worse than before we invaded.
@MaleGoddess @coded_artist Exactly, 99% of wars are just the ruling class trying to get even more rich. Call it the Jews, politicians, the rich or whatever. The point is: dying of an infection from a dirty bayonet in Flanders, of starvation/hypothermia in Stalingrad or getting blown up to pieces in Iraq is not a good thing for the people and your government gaining power/resources from the result of a "victory" won't even be beneficial for you as you're merely a subject. Of course wars for survival must be fought but that simply wasn't the case for Germany in WW2 (nor for the UK, for that matter). And no, invading half of Eastern Europe and trying to humiliate Britain and France isn't a way of surviving judeo-bolshevism or whatever you think motivated Germany to start that war.
I think the case of the Entente/Allies is quite clear, yes they've won two world wars but what did the people gain from that? A massive debt to Jewish banks whose interests didn't align with those of the people, inflation, having to import hundreds of thousands (or even millions) of Africans/indians/Arabs to rebuild their countries since the native population was crippled (quite literally in many cases) and, the worst part, a collective guilty conscience which turned everyone into a weak faggot and perpetuates those three issues to this day.
@riz @coded_artist

We got Texas in a war. I'd say that's pretty bad ass.
Many of those men who fought and died in that war will be forever memorialized. There isn't a kid in America that hasn't heard of Davy Crockett.

Yeah, war sucks, and back to my point, war for your own people and lands > fake and gay wars.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.