@lucky @matrix "Historically oppressive groups".

@rasterman @lucky @matrix
> They use the term “majority” because white people currently make up a majority of the US population.
> Once that changes they’ll use a different word that covers the same group.

It's far more likely that they will just change the definition of "majority" to mean something else, like it's been done with "sexism" and "racism".

@sheetposter @rasterman @matrix They might have already. I know a guy of east Asian ethnicity who was told by his work (big NY bank/finance type company I won’t name) that he is not considered a minority by their standards, and I don’t think it has to do with Asians being common in Asia. Maybe they meant in their work place? I don’t know.

@sheetposter @matrix @rasterman I’m not sure how he found either. I wouldn’t be surprised if they had some promotion available for minorities he inquired about.

@lucky @sheetposter @matrix Any group that resists the parasitism and dysgenia of what we call "the left" will fall under whatever term they need to demonise and destroy them. They just can't help themselves. It's like asking a dog not to lick his balls.

@rasterman @matrix @sheetposter This was a big financial company, not some leftist org. I think they just want to avoid ethnicity based privileges as much as possible and know certain groups won’t cause a ruckus if denied.

@lucky @matrix @sheetposter I'll take your word for it.

@matrix *quick