@SystemSock
> It fueled a socialist revolution in Russia, it will cause a boogaloo in the west.
Learn history better.
> It fueled a socialist revolution in Russia, it will cause a boogaloo in the west.
Learn history better.
@myaa > Go EdUcAtE yOuRsElf.
Sure.
Sure.
@SystemSock In short, the comparison is NOT CORRECT
@myaa You still didn't explain anything.
As I understand it, the royal family grew distant, not responding to the needs of their subjects, while Marxists conspired to usurp them.
The Marxists would not have the man-power if not for disenfranchised masses buying into their nonsense.
What did I get wrong?
As I understand it, the royal family grew distant, not responding to the needs of their subjects, while Marxists conspired to usurp them.
The Marxists would not have the man-power if not for disenfranchised masses buying into their nonsense.
What did I get wrong?
@matrix The comment section gives me hope.
One mistake though... The same mistake, they always make, over and over again...
Biology.
The disenfranchised and demoralized don't all react the same.
This is what we see in this video.
It fueled a socialist revolution in Russia, it will cause a boogaloo in the west.
The fundamental truth is this: Marxists are just dumb, they know not what they do.