@SystemSock @matrix wow you glossed over my pronouns and the part where it says i'm not a MAP! impressive!

@KayFaraday @matrix You wrote in your profile that you are a pedo socially and politically, so a pedo and a pro-pedo advocate/activist.

@SystemSock @matrix

pro-pedo advocate/activist

yes

a pedo

no (again not like it matters)

@KayFaraday @matrix
> Don't advocate for fucking kids
> Pro-pedo activist.
This is your brain on leftism.

Just kill yourself.
@waltercool @SystemSock @KayFaraday @matrix consider for a moment that hardened killers and utterly evil people will *literally murder* pedophiles in prison.

the monsters in the dark hate kid touchers.

@icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock the majority of pedophiles do not commit sexual offenses, and while murdering anyone for any reason is abhorrent, killing someone for an unchosen attraction especially so!

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @SystemSock I'm super open mind and not necessarily disagree with pedophiles in theory (because philias/phobias might be mental sickness).

Now, if someone, whatever is pedophile/MAP/drunk/high/weirdo attempts something against a real child, it deserves the worst, just like any rapist.

There is an "acceptable age range" formula for that. Anything outside that is super weird at most societies, specially on kids.

If you like kids, then I would strongly suggest to watch toddlercon/shotacon/lolicon instead. Drawn art doesn't harm real humans.
@KayFaraday @waltercool @matrix @SystemSock i don't really care as long as they don't touch actual children. :cirno_shrug:

@icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock then be specific: you could say "child abuser" instead of "pedophile" next time, as the latter refers only to an attraction

Show newer
Show newer
Show newer
Show newer
@icedquinn @KayFaraday @SystemSock @matrix @waltercool The problem with this approach is that the non-contact ones will always attempt to normalize it. Every single time. If you give a pedo an inch, they'll stick 5 in your daughter. They'll infest any community that gives them any leeway whatsoever, overrun it, then get it nuked when they inevitably start posting CP.
Show newer
Show newer
Show newer
Show newer

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock

>mental sickness
The historical average was 20+ men marrying 12-16yo girls. Still today: 5 more phallometric studies indicating proportion of men more or equally sexually aroused by children (up to 13 years old) than by adults:
27.7% (Firestone et al. 2000)
14.3% (Marshall et al. 1986)
18.3% (Fedora et al. 1992)
19.4% (Freund et al. 1991)
25% (Seto et al. 2000)
men rated female faces about 13 years old the most attractive: researchgate.net/publication/2
The BMI men find the most attractive is about 17-20 which is the typical BMI for girls about 13. Women naturally get fatter when they start having babies so a low BMI is another sign of nulliparity and youth.

>There is an "acceptable age range"
An arbitrary one
>at most societies
Citation needed. The idea of not being able to marry a 12yo was absurd in every society just 200 years ago

@applejack @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock
> Citation needed.

That's an easy test, you can try. Go to some big social network, and ask people if they would be OK if you would date a 12yo girl as a 20yo person.

> The idea of not being able to marry a 12yo was absurd in every society just 200 years ago

The world is radically different than 200yo lmao, it's even socially very different than 80yo

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock White countries are jewed so they care. Nobody else does. You can have a 12yo gf in south america, or asia, or africa, or ME, or whatever, and nobody really cares unless it's to uphold some shittest set by white countries. Japan still allows you to be in a sexual relationship with a 12yo if you can prove that it's real love

>The world is radically different than 200yo lmao
Yes, and that's a bad thing. Natural evolved traditions over arbitrarily modern garbage. There is no good justification for it

Show newer
@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @waltercool A hungry wolf is not immoral, but I don't go to sleep while it prowls near.

It may not be their choice, it's also not the child's choice, and I don't care.

Pedophiles get the rope.

@waltercool @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock All of those are dumb, but the idea of being able to prevent someone from consenting is a violation of the NAP. If you think you can coerce them against committing voluntary acts, then you might as well start taxing them for their own good

And feminist (jewish (degenerate)) influence in the first place is the reason it's taboo to marry a 12yo anymore, so blue is dumb too

@applejack @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock Different times, different worlds. We are at times where males and females are considered as equal.

In past, relationships were arranged and made in order to obtain land and power mostly like both examples you provided. Not by attraction and usually managed by parents, very usually women were the kids.

At that time, women were intended as a person to have and raise kids, prepare food and stay in home. Reason why it exists at some middle-east countries.

@waltercool @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock
Yes, exactly. We agree. This is the natural order of things, which modernity crushes because they'd rather have women wageslaving.

@waltercool @applejack @KayFaraday @SystemSock @matrix >Different times, different worlds.
Exactly.
For most of history, humans wiped their asses with their bare hand, then didn't wash (because they couldn't in most cases). Would anyone, then, say "it was true for the majority of history, therefore it is tradition and therefore better because it is always better to go back to the old ways before degeneracy like washing hands took over"?

@cowanon @matrix @KayFaraday @waltercool @SystemSock

>humans wiped their asses with their bare hand, then didn't wash
No, they didn't. You're literally just making that up.

The difference between now and then is that traditions evolved, while random people today just randomly decided that "actually marrying LGs is bad" and proliferated it through the media. It's also made up

@matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock You missed the post where he got punted from a project's Github and all of his contributions reversed over posting a "rape children" meme
That site needs to go
@mrsaturday @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock any instance with the word "pedo" on it gets a NO from me. Don't like what you do or think about doing to the youth.
@alfaniner @KayFaraday @SystemSock @matrix "I'm not advocating kidfucking I'm just advocating normalizing kidfuckers"
Why are so many of them trans

@matrix ah, well, animals, i'm somewhat certain can consent. the jury's out on kids though! i think more research is probably needed there. so i don't advocate that just yet!

@KayFaraday
Tbh I'm unsure about the "animals can't consent" however consent is basically useless in such a situation

@matrix @KayFaraday why is basically every single zoophile on fedi also a pedophile :(
@matrix @KayFaraday Any discussion with someone who asks for "Pronouns" at their profile it's wasteful and retarded time.

Myself included 😉

Also, MAPs deserve to be hanged.
@matrix @KayFaraday MAPs < Communists/Fascists < Furries < Pinapple Pizza

That order
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.