Sargon is a pomo trad now 
"People did science wrong therefore science bad"
"People found results I didn't like therefore science bad"
"People studied thing I didn't like therefore science bad"
"Some nerd doesn't leave his room therefore science bad"
@matrix
Treating science as a monolith is part of the problem. It's a human endeavor with some rules for attempted self-correction but it's just as corruptible as, say, FIFA rules or an HR Company.
For me, I just really hate the "I fucking love science" crowd. I had to write on the history of peer review and came across things like Retraction Watch where you can watch the science sausage being made. ProTip: It ain't pretty.
Highly recommended to deluded optimists and "peer reviewed" paper fans.
retractionwatch.com/
Treating science as a monolith is part of the problem. It's a human endeavor with some rules for attempted self-correction but it's just as corruptible as, say, FIFA rules or an HR Company.
For me, I just really hate the "I fucking love science" crowd. I had to write on the history of peer review and came across things like Retraction Watch where you can watch the science sausage being made. ProTip: It ain't pretty.
Highly recommended to deluded optimists and "peer reviewed" paper fans.
retractionwatch.com/
Follow
@nobullyplz
Yeah, peer review means nothing. It's basically "Your paper contains grammatically correct sentences".
