The overlap between the far-right and far-left is real no matter how many copes they post
"I'm not like them! My cause is just!"
@matrix You think you're right and I'm wrong? Well, I think that I'M right and YOU'RE wrong, so that means we are EXACTLY THE SAME
Don't you DARE argue against me, that would be breaking this made up neutrality that nobody agreed to and nobody follows
@applejack I'm not saying people can't be right or wrong. I have issue with certain axioms and tactics they share. I see no attempt at understanding what's right or wrong.
In this case case we have a paleolibertarian sharing a basic commie take that murdering your boss would fix things.
Or with the AA video. They are behaving as leftist do with nazis. To the far-left everyone icky is a nazis. To the far-right everyone icky is a pedo. And both call for their murder.
@matrix Taking the meme seriously, nowhere does it say you should kill anyone
There is a real psychological frustration with this, and that's the only point it's making
https://unabombermanifesto.com/#AUTONOMY
https://unabombermanifesto.com/#DISRUPTION%20OF%20THE%20POWER%20PROCESS%20IN%20MODERN%20SOCIETY
АА is literally a libertarian ecelebrity
@applejack
I think if you take the meme literally it says "I'm not saying you should kill your boss, but you would have an easier time acquiring essentials if there weren't severe repercussions for doing so"
Ok, if you don't take it literally, it describes this feeling of lack of autonomy. To it all I can say "deal with it", because like Uncle Ted says, you are safe even if you don't think you are.
Nah, AA is a neo-reactionary now
@matrix
Again, nowhere does it say you should kill them. There's powerlessness and frustration in being pushed around, especially when it's from some kike twerp, which is why it says "who you could kill"
119. The system does not and cannot exist to satisfy human needs. Instead, it is human behavior that has to be modified to fit the needs of the system. [...] It is simply taken for granted that everyone must bow to technical necessity. [...] The concept of "mental health" in our society is defined largely by the extent to which an individual behaves in accord with the needs of the system and does so without showing signs of stress.
The reason I fell out of libertarianism is because I realised "technical necessity" isn't something in and of itself worth striving for
@applejack
Does not and cannot are different things. I would argue that it does satisfy human needs, but because it does it so well, we fall into a state of lethargy.
