@dave @oxblood It does imo

@matrix @dave @oxblood this shit happens constantly. I know of one incident that I know of where one woman refused to do work and change diapers for a client and a male had to change a female client. This had caused APS to get reported by the woman who refused to do work on the male. Luckily nothing happened because APS understood the situation was stupid in the first place.

Generally you need to put your foot down and call people retards when this happens. It's worse if people find out protocol got in the way of protecting someone getting injured or sick than to get into trouble for breaking a rule.

@matrix @dave @oxblood *refused to do work on the female

@dave @matrix yeah they should have standard cleaners and a few trained in bio hazard

anyone who knows their rights will refuse unless they have bio haz training

I would bet its due to short staffing and only a handful of people employed with the training (which is stupid because you would think in a hospital, most cleaners would have it)

@dave @matrix personally I would have just done it - in carework I handle poop almost daily and don't need to do any biohaz training. especially because they know the patient it's from so know their health records

@MrBones @matrix When the janny began to hate

@tengumatingpress @matrix My negative opinions about women were shaped by actually interacting with them. Professionally and socially.

Crazy! I know.

@MrBones @matrix I don't trust anyone whose contempt for women comes from speculative nonsense like evopsych, it's only legitimate if they've sort of interacted with them