@Aldo2 No, Spencer is either a glowie or a retard. I follow Cofnas.
The right is better on economics in principle, however the Republicans don't always follow RW ecomics (they like cutting taxes, but not reducing spending -> inflation).
FDR's term was followed by a post WW2 boom. Generally Dem or Rep in the WH has very little effect on the economy (unless he does something retarded like Trump).
>DEI policies are better than fake "meritocracy"
kinda, it's like saying shooting yourself once is preferable to shooting yourself twice. However you are presenting a false dichotomy.
>"without me, you will become cavemen"
the unfortunate reality is that this is more true than it is false. Power vacuums simply cannot exist. It's not about US being a good boy who dindu nuthin'.
And people do generally view US positively.
Did you read the article?
>depends on what these "elites" believe and how strongly they believe in it.
That's what Cofnas is saying
>is this guy against Trumpism
The implication of that paragraph is that it's bad. It's destruction outweighing the fixing actual problems.
>failings of C(r)apitalism providing for the ordinary man
objectively that's simply false, you have that in the article.
@Aldo2
>"Better in principle" but not in practice
I forgot that in practice too, but on a state level
https://www.richardhanania.com/p/forty-years-of-economic-freedom-winning
>I didn't say it was an either or
You said you weren't fond of DEI either, which implied a picking between bad and worse.
Society that prides itself on "egalitarianism" is bad, because it's a utopian aspiration based on creationist tier assumptions.
It brings better results simply because it's a belief disproportionally held by elites. As a belief it's destructive, because outside of the naive elites, it fuels/is fueled by ethnic resentment. It too requires yes men willing to ignore that the oppressed don't share your utopian ideals.
>Trump's "yes men" are also very "diverse" as well, which is an irony in of itself
There is no irony. You see it simply because you've built a strawman.
> "Might makes right".
Might doesn't make right, but it's not feasible to have right without might.
>But there is nothing here about "reform" or "fixing" the problem
Yeah, I do kinda that Cofnas doesn't really much offer a way forward. However you simply can't not have elites.
>He is against Trump, then for Trump, then against him, then for him, then against...
Where is he for Trump?
>C(r)apitalism
There's simply no reason to blame capitalism here because the problems you're claiming it causes are either largely exaggerated or not real
>"Source: Heritage foundation"
Cmon you gotta have something better than that
@Aldo2
>Richard Hanania
Cmon, throw me something
>egalitarianism by WASPs
I know. That's what I said. WASPs have some naive ideals, but sometimes it's self hate and the reason they resonate with the oppressed is because they see it as way to get back at whitey. BLM is that
Lots of migrant crime in Europe is racially motivated.
>not all
They are the same in the eyes of the egalitarian elites.
Obviously, "the oppressed" aren't an united block, but the ones that get lifted up by activists, media etc do have, if not resentment, strong feelings of kinship with their ethic group. And in general are more likely to feel that way than westerners.
>Absolute LOL moment
Diversity as a goal you actively aim for isn't equivalent to diversity as a neutral consequence of policy.
>If there is no difference between the two, why change from DEI?
Because there's a difference between a personal dick sucker and an ideological stooge, even if both weren't hired on merit.
Explain why you can't have a presidency that doesn't support anti white discrimination and also isn't full of president's dick suckers.
>The point is Cofnas is not "right", ergo he doesn't deserve the "might" that comes with it
China or some warlord in some Bumfuckistan aren't right either but they don't give a fuck that they aren't
>There is EVERY reason to blame C(r)apitalism.
You gotta show me some
@Aldo2
>opportunist first and foremost
Trump, but in the same way I can just dismiss your Salon article.
>It is not self-hate
It often is. Or empathy one should have for children misplaced towards "oppressed" people. There is no pragmatic reason for subsidizing an unproductive group (ever growing if you consider the entire world), while also opposing ways of filtering out the productive ones.
>So because someone is engaging in racially motivated crime, you're blaming White liberals?
I'm not the best at expressing myself, but there's no way you can reasonably interpret my reply like that
>They play one group against the other all the time!
You're saying it like that makes it better
>this is sociology 1-0-1.
I know, you can't say that after claiming DEI is pragmatic.
>in your mind, Trumpian nepotism is better than DEI
From the start I've said it's same or worse depending on the angle.
>You think Trumpian nepotism is "neutral"
It's racially neutral. The criteria is "How many yes'es you can say", not "Are you non white"
>So you're saying a "pro-White" presidency is naturally not meritocratic in any way?
Explicitly pro-white implies racism so yes.
>Also, being "pro-White" is also an ideology, just like being pro-DEI
yes, that's why it's bad.
But being against anti-white racism isn't being pro-white
>The whole argument for being "pro-White" was a "return to meritocracy". Hundreds of articles were written about this.
No? The racial identarians don't want a meritocracy, because it doesn't benefit whites 100%.
>Import turd world ideas, become the turd world, no?
Guarding against thirdworldism isn't importing thirdworld ideas.
Many of the failures of capitalism (like expensive housing) are actually just a consequence of government policy. Or don't event matter (like inequality).
@Aldo2
>Definition of implicit bias admitting you can't prove it, just trust us bro
I expected nothing better from Reddit.
The quality of schools is largely selection. A school is good because good students attend it. It's why private schools are so good because they can be very selective who goes there.
Ironically, schools that could select out the problematic black kids would help individual black people more than things like Obama era restrictions on black kids.
The definition of systemic racism is just the equity fallacy, unequal results = racism.
Result we don't like is totally racism, but explicit policy that discriminates against a race of people is actually anti-racism.
>"China and Bumfuckistan aren't right either, but they don't give a fuck that they aren't"
The American empire is right more often than the thirdworld tyrants, partially because it does understand that might isn't right
>Austrian schoolers gonna Austrian school...
yes
@Aldo2@gameliberty.club @matrix@gameliberty.club
This faggot crap is irrelevant. The only good nigger man is a dead nigger.
TND TPD TKD
Wipe out and replace Africa with Europeans.
