Show newer

@r000t
I think that PDP would have a case against WSJ since one of the authors of the article made similar jokes in the past, which I think could be used as a proof of the article being malicious, not just an oopsie and since the journos contacted Disney which resulted in the cancelation of his contract, damages would be easy to prove.
Obviously sueing randos on the internet is just retarded and unproductive.
I wonder how Vic's case is going to end up since the Tumblr account with the accusations admitted they were lying.

@r000t
I always wondered why PewDiePie didn't sue the WSJ for libel.

I really hate these brainlet stances.
"We're not in the court room, so that means it's okay to behave like a bunch of primitive retards"
Piss off

@pony @rin @igeljaeger uncompressed serving non-progressive jpegs on a social content-rich service used from mobile is a crime against humanity.

And users donât care enough (even if aware) to optimise before upload.
𤠠im gonna take my blonde to the old town road ð¤ 
Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.