@freemo
Sitch's law in action. Just arguing definitions.
Yeah I agree with that. Moderation is the key.
@freemo
Or they are trying to get people like that off their backs.
@freemo
Socialism is a step towards communism though.
But Goldman Sachs just want good PR and money. They don't want socialism or communism. They are a private company after all.
The mostlikely scenario is that some ideologically driven organizations (who believe that through social engineering and pressure, they can achieve communism) convinced Goldman Sachs that decisions like this are good for business.
@freemo
I wouldn't call it socialism, because the wealth redistribution of socialism is done by some form of social ownership of the means of production, not simply higher taxes.
@freemo
They support welfare programs and taxpayer funded health care. I wouldn't really call that socialism.
@freemo
I guess, but for the people who believe in it (not Goldman and Sachs, they are just trying to appear virtuous), the goal is communism.
@freemo
It's both. They aren't mutually exclusive.
It's communism because the calls for representation are based on the lens of class warfare extended to different groups.
I'm the joke, but you're the punchline.
I run this website. I like posting funnies and fugging lolis.