@hj
Lidl indeed sucks
@ChristiJunior
I'm taking about the ideological side. Not power. Both the alt-right and alt-left behave exactly the same way in a position of power.
I'm fully aware of the power the left has. It's the reasons why I mostly talk about the left. The fart huffing
individuals that say a comment with two likes is the same as journalist lying piss me off too.
@daughter @jeff
@ChristiJunior
Twitter usually doesn't give reasons. It's possible that some spergs went through his profile and mass reported posts.
Twitter is usually fairly quick at responding to reports.
@ChristiJunior
They need the boogie man to hide their suppression of the more sensible opposition. They don't need the actual alt-right.
A ton of the people banned from Twitter had nothing to do with the alt-right.
@jeff
@ChristiJunior
He got suspended for spaming interracial gay porn, but he got banned when he was arguing with the alt-right about the holocaust.
@jeff
The left needs the alt-right to exist to justify their totalitarian ideas.
The both extremes live in symbiosis.
>He has been banned from Twitter for his views
He was banned for disagreeing with the alt-right.
This sentence completely changes meaning when you introduce the truth. In that case it would mean that Twitter supports the alt-right.
Hitpieces. Nice. I expect nothing more.
https://archive.fo/dK7Aq
@ivan
That could be the case. It's possible that the authorities tried to pressure them into giving them private information without the proper paperwork.
But in that case why would they mention hate speech in this post.
@pixelfed@mstdn.io
I'm the joke, but you're the punchline.
I run this website. I like posting funnies and fugging lolis.