This article is extremely dumb. Stop using the word right for literally anything
https://archive.fo/aFvRM
1.Not a right, but ok
2.Not a rights violations. "without a Gender Recognition Certificate"
3.Not a right violation. Plus it's contradictory with a later point.
4.Not a right. KYS.
5.Not a right violation. So, gay men can't donate blood after sex, because there's high risk they have HIV and you call that discrimination, but then you say a drug that highly decreases chance of getting HIV not being widely available is discrimination too, therefore admitting that the precautions for donating blood are necessary.
6.Sure, but not a right violation
7."Pressured" isn't a right violation and with kids it's up to the parent.
8.Sure
9.Sure, but I have a feeling telling kids homosexuality exists isn't enough for you
10.Anecdotal evidence
11.Protests by who? Also not a right violation
12.I dunno
"An individual cannot apply for a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) if they are married, or in a civil partnership in Northern Ireland" That's dumb.
13.Probably should be for practical reasons, but not a right violation
14.Not a right violation
15.Probably not a right violation based on the links
I'm the joke, but you're the punchline.
I run this website. I like posting funnies and fugging lolis.