Show newer

I'm happy to unveil a new picture of Freedo, the mascot of GNU Linux-libre. The picture is called Bath Time:

jxself.org/git/?p=freedo.git;a

Freedo cleans Tux.

Licensed under GFDL-1.3-or-later; see the README for historical information.

I'm installing #LinuxMint #Debian Edition 5 (beta) on a MacBook Air (2013). #macOS couldn't be upgraded to the latest version and some things in the web browser were not working correctly.

The owner of this laptop only used it for web browsing and listening to podcasts and videos, but that stopped working correctly due to the browser being out dated.

This is a problem that I have run into with other MacBooks, too. #Linux to the rescue!

New blog post!🎊🎊

This is probably the question we’ve been asked the most at Penpot so Andrey Antukh made this great article about: "Penpot chose Clojure as its language and here’s why"

Read it and let us know your thoughts 🙋‍♀️

blog.kaleidos.net/penpot-chose

We're aiming for a release a few weeks after Ubuntu 22.04 is released next month. Risk of a date skip: medium.
---
RT @TymekDev
@RegolithL When 2.0 is going to be released? Should I hold back with giving 1.6 a go, or is there enough time to get acquainted with Regolith at all?
twitter.com/TymekDev/status/15

Read about today's talks: Command Line tools for design, Replicant, Opening keynote with artist collective Hundred Rabbits, and closing Keynote with Zoë Kooyman, executive director of the FSF, and more! u.fsf.org/3iv

From today's final keynote: Zoë said that she has "an endless amount of examples and reasons to believe that free software is the way forward, worth protecting, and something we need to make sure people understand how to fight for."

Another problem: what should we say when referring to proprietary software?

Many people, especially in the west, view "proprietary" as a good thing. They see "property" and think you don't own free software (yet, you do own your copy).

I propose the term "restricted software".

Show thread

The other fallback term, which I've sometimes used already, is "freedom-respecting software".

All software I release is also free of charge. That said, I want there to be no (or less) ambiguity about what I mean when I talk about software or hardware. I'm in favour of *freedom*.

Show thread

I've been thinking: what if we had a better term than "free software" to say "free software"? Same ideological zeal, in an unambiguous fashion. This question pertains to English-speaking communities.

I have decided to say "freedom software".
Also: "freedom hardware".

Thoughts?

Come hang out in LibreAdventure and check in with our sponsor at the supporter level: Spruce! @SpruceID and talk with them about how they let users control their data across the web. #LibrePlanet

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.