His evidence is non-existent. In the methods section of the paper, Classen writes, “The vaccine RNA was analyzed for the presence of sequences that can activate TDP-43 and FUS.” How was it analyzed? What software was used? Did he examine any controls, like cellular mRNA sequences? He doesn’t say. He simply tells us that the COVID vaccines contain various RNA sequences that may trigger TDP-43 and FUS’s misfolding.
The actual paper is short and dense and he does talk about actual experiment’s as well as “Two GGΨA sequences were found. G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but sophisticated computer programs are needed to verify these.”.
This article says, “x scientists are making this up and speculating” .. the paper indicates the authors have done actual work. The right response is, “I could or could not replicate the study,” but the author doesn’t say anything about replication. The author simply says it is baseless speculation and complains there isn’t enough data to replicate it.
It’s lazy. It’s speculative. If the author was concerned about the paper, they’d gather a research group to try to replicate the findings.
