imagine enacting a :blobcatphoto: but quinn over misreading a grammatical structure

@icedquinn It wasnt about the gramatical structure, it was about the incorrect facts it inferred (which were still incorrect once you corrected your wording).

@freemo i didn't correct the wording because it wasn't structured wrong to begin with :blobcatpuffyhuh:

@icedquinn Either way, your statement was incorrect.. there is no meaningful link between SAr-COV-2 and the common cold

@freemo i also didn't claim there was :blobcatpuffyhuh:

i said the ones we know about have a lot of mutations, therefore inferred they are highly mutatable.
@icedquinn @freemo From what I've seen, SARS-CoV-2 actually mutates quite slowly, certainly slower than influenza or any number of cold coronaviruses
@allison IIRC it mutates every two weeks but mutations within a particular lineage of viruses mutate slowly.

@icedquinn @freemo
@thatbrickster @freemo @icedquinn In any case, most mutations are basically inconsequential. The "mutants" you hear about are just the ones that actually manage to do anything to distinguish themselves from their brethren

@allison

Actually coronavirus and all RNA viruses mutate **faster** than DNA viruses.. its just that recombination isnt considered a mutation so DNA viruses **adapt** quicker without relying on mutations (as in novel genes)

@icedquinn @thatbrickster

@freemo @allison @thatbrickster my concern is that like the initial outbreak, there are only so many cycles before containment is essentially failed.

what is the expectation? are they going to put everyone back in to lockdown every time a mutation is found (which there will always be one) until they can rush a new EUA and just keep people on an indefinite chain of experimental vaccines? :blobcatshrug2:

@icedquinn

Two seperate topics here.. 1) the discussion around how likely and common it will be for the CV to circumvent vaccines and 2) what procedure saves the most lives when there is an outbreak.

To #1, we should be pretty good. Its always a crap shoot but even against current variants like the delta variant the vaccine efficacy is still very higher (88% - 93%). so in reality people are over reacting over it. As long as people are getting vaccinated they are pretty safe

As for #2, lockdowns were never an effective solution even before it mutated. We had contagion guidelines in place long before CV and while quarantine was a part of it, that only carried so far as to when the virus is in a isolated geographic location. All traditional advice when it comes to contagion suggests that once a virus is out into the wild that lockdowns cause greater loss of life and are not effective at reducing the total long term body count.

So considering lockdown as a viable solution has never been a good idea.

@allison @thatbrickster

@freemo @icedquinn @allison @thatbrickster I doubt all mRNA injections efficacy. There were literality zero controls. There were no challenges. I doubt their efficacy is even real, considering all the bullshit they've pulled with the trials and studies. with all the neurological issues, they really need to be fucking pulled a month ago.

Ivermectin is actually effective against CoV2 and it substantially safer than the novel mRNA injectables.
Follow

@djsumdog @icedquinn @freemo @allison @thatbrickster Too bad Ivermectin is not OTC. I heard that Garlic is effective at combating it. People really underestimate the power of natural healing herbs.

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 1
@xianc78 hilarious part is HQC is but only in some countries.

in the US even with a prescription the pharmacies were in on the scam. they just refused to fill them.

@djsumdog @freemo @allison @thatbrickster
@icedquinn @xianc78 @allison @freemo @thatbrickster You guys listen to the Joe Rogan podcast on it? They don't have the annoying dude from the YouTube one that got taken down and they cover HQC, Ivro, censorship .. was worth the listen.
@djsumdog no i don't listen to rogan but i've heard from other sources the messes they are in with funding it after ethics boards said the project was too dangerous.

i don't care as much about them doing the research as i do the ass covering after the fact. we know from Veritas that FB is circulating memos to ban "true facts and events" so not only are you not allowed to mention potential treatments as a licensed doctor risking your MD, but you're not even allowed to talk about legitimate vaers reports.

@allison @freemo @thatbrickster @xianc78
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.