@xianc78 umm... there's no citation ❓
@xianc78 B R U H
i dont want people grabbing my IP addy
Like i get ur logic... if we can get 2 different sources that are in favour, and 2 that are in opposition, that would be ideal (preferably something that isnt phishy)- so we can form a critical analysis.
There is nothing wrong with CO2 or climate change per se, but CO2 wont be good for anything if all the forests get logged and factories destroy the ozone layer. The crony industrialists like the Koch brothers do put billions into anti-ecological propaganda and action... we do need to be cautious.
i dont want people grabbing my IP addy
Like i get ur logic... if we can get 2 different sources that are in favour, and 2 that are in opposition, that would be ideal (preferably something that isnt phishy)- so we can form a critical analysis.
There is nothing wrong with CO2 or climate change per se, but CO2 wont be good for anything if all the forests get logged and factories destroy the ozone layer. The crony industrialists like the Koch brothers do put billions into anti-ecological propaganda and action... we do need to be cautious.
i think this stuff is almost 20 yrs old... which is probs why all the links at the bottom are http as well.
Obviously in this context and the current mainstream, neither the "alarmists" nor "skeptics" are talking about carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, methane, benzene, dioxin, lead and particulates like silicates. There is a weird fixation on CO2 i'll admit.
Also, most of the danger from air pollution happens indoors- mostly gentrified houses that dont have windows u can open, also the smog from industrial complexes and urban areas.
Also no mention of the consequences of industrial fishing, industrial monoculture and oil rigs.