I wish I could of seen the faces of the postal workers who handled this as it made it's way to me 
@fl0wnspc whoa, you're still active?
@coolboymew not so active online but alive at least
@fl0wnspc @coolboymew good to see you.
@fl0wnspc @coolboymew how many watchlists do you suppose you're on for ordering that lol
@coolboymew @fl0wnspc I'll let fl0wn talk about it but it looks like a home genetic engineering kit.
Follow
@Moon @coolboymew @fl0wnspc That's what it is. You can create your own GMOs such as glow in the dark bacteria.
> But Stanford University infectious disease expert Dr. David Relman, who co-directs the Center for International Security and Cooperation, has serious concerns.
> Although Relman supports the thoughtful and productive engagement in science by the general public, he strongly opposes Zayner’s method.
> “You can’t simply go into a cockpit and fly a plane,” said Relman. “Likewise, you can’t simply pick up a pipette and do science.”
> Science involves a set of moral and ethical principles, particularly when it comes to animal testing. Handing out frog gene therapy kits for anyone to use is a clear noncompliance with those principles, argues Relman.
In:
https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/01/19/new-gene-editing-kit-puts-the-power-of-frog-growth-into-citizen-scientists-hands/
seeing “Likewise, you can’t simply pick up a pipette and do science.” triggered my hold my beer instinct @Moon @coolboymew