"There's no clear way to define what a woman is, there's literally billions of women and each of them have unique characteristics, and we can't forget about the .001% of the population with vaginapenis syndrome, clearly biology can't account for this"
"Boys have a penis and girls have a vagina"
"Boys have a penis and girls have a vagina"
@PraxisOfEvil even better. If there's no clear way to define what a woman is, then there is also no clear way to define what a man is, considering there exists billions of them all with different characteristics plus the 0,001% with some weird genetic anomaly.
If there is no way to define what a man is, then there is no way to exist something as "the patriarchy", since there is no simple and clear cut definition of what it means to belong to a category.
Accusing someone of having "male privilege" is senseless, since by acknowledging the sheer diversity of people that are commonly cathegorized under an umbrella term, they should also acknowledge that not everyone under this term has the same lived experiences, biological characteristics (not 100% anyways) and other conditions, so it's impossible to all of these people to take advantage of a same perceived privilege.
The so called "progressives" get lost so much in their semantics that their own definition of some things invalidates their own definition of other things, forcing them to redefine terms all the time (like the "racism" meaning rewriting).
I find it a shame that no one smart, influent fellow who's also not a completely unhinged person calls them out on this (and no, Ben Shapiro doesn't count).
If there is no way to define what a man is, then there is no way to exist something as "the patriarchy", since there is no simple and clear cut definition of what it means to belong to a category.
Accusing someone of having "male privilege" is senseless, since by acknowledging the sheer diversity of people that are commonly cathegorized under an umbrella term, they should also acknowledge that not everyone under this term has the same lived experiences, biological characteristics (not 100% anyways) and other conditions, so it's impossible to all of these people to take advantage of a same perceived privilege.
The so called "progressives" get lost so much in their semantics that their own definition of some things invalidates their own definition of other things, forcing them to redefine terms all the time (like the "racism" meaning rewriting).
I find it a shame that no one smart, influent fellow who's also not a completely unhinged person calls them out on this (and no, Ben Shapiro doesn't count).
@Suzu @PraxisOfEvil If you can't define a woman then you can't define anything. Postmodernism is a cancer.
Follow
@ArdainianRight @PraxisOfEvil @Suzu Just wait until plurality becomes accepted. Then, 1 body =/= 1 person and you have to ask who the person you are talking to every time you talk to someone because it might be a different "identity running that body."
I've been frequently day-dreaming about this lately.
@xianc78 @ArdainianRight @PraxisOfEvil @Suzu My body has me in it, who controls my brain and most executive functions, and it has 4 other fat Italian plumbers in it, that take turns controlling my butt.
