>Yet another C++ replacement
>Carbon
>We also have explicit non-goals for Carbon, notably including:
>A stable ABI for the entire language and library
Yup, it's dead to me.
>Carbon
>We also have explicit non-goals for Carbon, notably including:
>A stable ABI for the entire language and library
Yup, it's dead to me.
@lanodan
>Made by Google
So is this just an object-oriented Go?
@ryo @xianc78 @lanodan Is it really? I’m not too familiar with either, but from what I’ve seen of them and read about tehm, C++ seems to differ from C in subtle ways and mix in lots of its own syntax, while Objective-C is just C with object definitions and messaging in the form of [object message]. Or is there much more to it?
@tirifto @xianc78 @lanodan Sure, both C++ and Objective-C are different variations with different ways of doing OOPs.
However, at least C++'s syntax is still learnable for a C programmer, whereas Objective-C's syntax is so unlike C and C++, it'll easily make you destroy your Mac with a hammer, and buy yourself a Librebooted ThinkPad.
However, at least C++'s syntax is still learnable for a C programmer, whereas Objective-C's syntax is so unlike C and C++, it'll easily make you destroy your Mac with a hammer, and buy yourself a Librebooted ThinkPad.
@xianc78 @ryo @tirifto Yeah for a language that old, it's packaged almost nowhere.
https://repology.org/project/swift-lang/versions
https://repology.org/project/swift-lang/versions
I do have an ancient MacBook Pro though, but it's running GhostBSD.
I tried to install FreeBSD, but Xorg refused to work, so I dubbed it FreeBullShiD.