@shebang And she died in a planned Jesuit ritual.
@ryo @xianc78 @shebang
The Rothschilds are Jews, and they have been doing what they do for a very long time ( https://odysee.com/@FTC-NL:0/Rothschilds-and-Bankers-world-Control---FTC-NL:6?r=C7ULE5xB9xgfrqi3FFhVKTufGhNR6Mwi&t=0 ), and already owned a huge chunk of the planet over a century ago.
The Rockefellers supposedly initially made their fortune from their dealings with the Rothschilds in the first place, and are themselves related to the British royals, at least according to this page https://humphrysfamilytree.com/famous.thelist.html , and so is Bill Gates, who is himself basically a Rockefeller. The Rockefellers are involved in funding every evil thing that you can possibly think of, including projects like MKUltra, and organizations like the WEF, the WHO and the UN. All of these families are also behind every single war in the 20th and 21st century.
There are other families like them, and I don't know how far back they go, but there are big banking families today that have been around since at least the Republic of Venice, and may have been behind the fucking crusades, for profit. The British empire possibly became successful in the first place because of the Venetian oligarchs moving their operations to Britain (lots of occultists involved, and they actually wrote a big chunk of the history that is taught today, by selecting some of their people to be the supposed inventors or discoverers of various things, and basically took over the scientific establishment), and then to America after they took it over.
Anyway, capitalism is a total fraud. No one actually becomes successful within it nowadays without being involved in some serious nepotism and deals with the devil, or being related to royalty or other rich psychopaths. They have monopolized the world's wealth a long time ago.
The Rothschilds are Jews, and they have been doing what they do for a very long time ( https://odysee.com/@FTC-NL:0/Rothschilds-and-Bankers-world-Control---FTC-NL:6?r=C7ULE5xB9xgfrqi3FFhVKTufGhNR6Mwi&t=0 ), and already owned a huge chunk of the planet over a century ago.
The Rockefellers supposedly initially made their fortune from their dealings with the Rothschilds in the first place, and are themselves related to the British royals, at least according to this page https://humphrysfamilytree.com/famous.thelist.html , and so is Bill Gates, who is himself basically a Rockefeller. The Rockefellers are involved in funding every evil thing that you can possibly think of, including projects like MKUltra, and organizations like the WEF, the WHO and the UN. All of these families are also behind every single war in the 20th and 21st century.
There are other families like them, and I don't know how far back they go, but there are big banking families today that have been around since at least the Republic of Venice, and may have been behind the fucking crusades, for profit. The British empire possibly became successful in the first place because of the Venetian oligarchs moving their operations to Britain (lots of occultists involved, and they actually wrote a big chunk of the history that is taught today, by selecting some of their people to be the supposed inventors or discoverers of various things, and basically took over the scientific establishment), and then to America after they took it over.
Anyway, capitalism is a total fraud. No one actually becomes successful within it nowadays without being involved in some serious nepotism and deals with the devil, or being related to royalty or other rich psychopaths. They have monopolized the world's wealth a long time ago.
@TerminalAutism @shebang @ryo
>Anyway, capitalism is a total fraud. No one actually becomes successful within it nowadays without being involved in some serious nepotism and deals with the devil
They only do it because they bribe the government. Get rid of the government then capitalism is the most liberating economic system.
@xianc78 @shebang @ryo
It's also worth mentioning that it doesn't matter where tyranny is coming from, it's still tyranny. I don't care if it calls itself government or if it calls itself corporation. Getting rid of the government and then Googleapplesoft coming in and saying "okay, we're the government now" would make absolutely nothing better.
Even nuking capitalism and starting it from scratch, you would just get some cutthroat psychopath like a Rockefeller or Rothschild making his way to the top once again and taking over everything and you're back right where you are right now except possibly worse. The most evil people, that are the best at exploiting other people, always win in capitalism. It's just what always happens. In a greed-based system, the greediest wins, and it turns out that greedy people don't care about other people's well-beings.
Anyway, I don't care which ism it is and about the nuances of what people call one ism and not another, it's still evil. There is no ideology that isn't evil. All of them limit your ability to think, and all of them make justifications for evil shit. Fuck all of them. There is no system that solves all the world's problems. Problem-solving does. You have a problem, and that problem has a cause, because causality exists. So you address the cause so it cannot happen anymore. If a new problem occurs, you do that again, to the new problem. If a solution doesn't work, you undo it and try something else.
No ideological nonsense necessary. Ideologies create problems, they don't solve them. They are actual mind-control tools. Mental prisons that prevent anything from actually being solved because people are busy arguing about which retarded ideology is better. I hate ideologies more than almost anything. Unless we get rid of every single one of them, this world is doomed. I don't care about "we want to be oppressed by the government" vs "we want to be oppressed by the corporations
vs "we want to be oppressed by the church" vs "we want to be oppressed by the next group of barbarians that shows up" debates.
I care about how to solve individual problems, and right now, the first step to solve anything is to get rid of all ideologies. People have to recognize what is happening and who is doing it and then deal with them. This is not going to happen while they are arguing about ideologies, all of which have been invented and pushed by that enemy. They have created all of them, every single one of them.
It's also worth mentioning that it doesn't matter where tyranny is coming from, it's still tyranny. I don't care if it calls itself government or if it calls itself corporation. Getting rid of the government and then Googleapplesoft coming in and saying "okay, we're the government now" would make absolutely nothing better.
Even nuking capitalism and starting it from scratch, you would just get some cutthroat psychopath like a Rockefeller or Rothschild making his way to the top once again and taking over everything and you're back right where you are right now except possibly worse. The most evil people, that are the best at exploiting other people, always win in capitalism. It's just what always happens. In a greed-based system, the greediest wins, and it turns out that greedy people don't care about other people's well-beings.
Anyway, I don't care which ism it is and about the nuances of what people call one ism and not another, it's still evil. There is no ideology that isn't evil. All of them limit your ability to think, and all of them make justifications for evil shit. Fuck all of them. There is no system that solves all the world's problems. Problem-solving does. You have a problem, and that problem has a cause, because causality exists. So you address the cause so it cannot happen anymore. If a new problem occurs, you do that again, to the new problem. If a solution doesn't work, you undo it and try something else.
No ideological nonsense necessary. Ideologies create problems, they don't solve them. They are actual mind-control tools. Mental prisons that prevent anything from actually being solved because people are busy arguing about which retarded ideology is better. I hate ideologies more than almost anything. Unless we get rid of every single one of them, this world is doomed. I don't care about "we want to be oppressed by the government" vs "we want to be oppressed by the corporations
vs "we want to be oppressed by the church" vs "we want to be oppressed by the next group of barbarians that shows up" debates.
I care about how to solve individual problems, and right now, the first step to solve anything is to get rid of all ideologies. People have to recognize what is happening and who is doing it and then deal with them. This is not going to happen while they are arguing about ideologies, all of which have been invented and pushed by that enemy. They have created all of them, every single one of them.
@TerminalAutism @shebang @ryo You can't just have no political system. If you reject all morals, structures, etc then you are an egoist.
@xianc78 @shebang @ryo I don't reject morals, and that is why I am against ideologies, and it's also why I am against greed-based systems. If you have morality, you don't need ideologies. Just be a good person and follow natural law, which is the logical thing to do in the first place. I'm not against the existence of a system, though it should be more of an antigovernment than an actual government. The US founders tried something kinda like that, but didn't go far enough and left too many gaps that ended up being exploited. Those gaps should be closed.
A system that exists to defend natural law and freedom, and nothing else, I guess is the ideal. It has to be limited, and the people within it should have to prove their altruism by losing any right to personal gain and by giving away all of their property, for the rest of their lives. When people in political positions can profit from their positions, the result is what we have right now. My solution is that politicians should basically have to live like monks. Maybe there is a better solution, but I haven't seen one because everyone is too busy arguing about which stupid ideology is less stupid.
Let's talk specifics. Problem → solution. Problem → solution. Problem → solution. And if the solution doesn't work, we try again. That's what builds functional systems, not ideology. I'm not talking about magical systems that supposedly solve everything and trying to think inside of those mind control boxes, I'm talking about actually coming up with solutions for individual problems.
Politicians are using their positions for personal gain, and that is a source of a lot of our problems, and those positions attract people like that in the first place. How do you solve that? You restrict what they can do, and you make the position unappealing to the people that currently want it. My idea does that. Maybe it's not the best, but I haven't seen any other ideas because again, people are arguing about their stupid shit instead of addressing causality and thinking about problem-solving, because of ideologies. Ideologies created by the people currently in power, to divide the population and create internal conflict, so that people don't go after them. The same people controlling the government that you dislike have also created this ideologically-obsessed society, and all the ideologies, including the ones that supposedly oppose them, that are a total dead-end and were created to be ineffective in the first place.
A system that exists to defend natural law and freedom, and nothing else, I guess is the ideal. It has to be limited, and the people within it should have to prove their altruism by losing any right to personal gain and by giving away all of their property, for the rest of their lives. When people in political positions can profit from their positions, the result is what we have right now. My solution is that politicians should basically have to live like monks. Maybe there is a better solution, but I haven't seen one because everyone is too busy arguing about which stupid ideology is less stupid.
Let's talk specifics. Problem → solution. Problem → solution. Problem → solution. And if the solution doesn't work, we try again. That's what builds functional systems, not ideology. I'm not talking about magical systems that supposedly solve everything and trying to think inside of those mind control boxes, I'm talking about actually coming up with solutions for individual problems.
Politicians are using their positions for personal gain, and that is a source of a lot of our problems, and those positions attract people like that in the first place. How do you solve that? You restrict what they can do, and you make the position unappealing to the people that currently want it. My idea does that. Maybe it's not the best, but I haven't seen any other ideas because again, people are arguing about their stupid shit instead of addressing causality and thinking about problem-solving, because of ideologies. Ideologies created by the people currently in power, to divide the population and create internal conflict, so that people don't go after them. The same people controlling the government that you dislike have also created this ideologically-obsessed society, and all the ideologies, including the ones that supposedly oppose them, that are a total dead-end and were created to be ineffective in the first place.
@cee @xianc78 @ryo You seem to be misinterpreting it. It has absolutely nothing to do with Darwinism. I mean it in the philosophical sense, of the objective morality that is inherent to reality. Something like the seven universal laws. Really, the golden rule covers morality pretty well. Christ doesn't teach it for nothing. If you do something to someone, you are giving them permission to do the same to you. If you harm others, you are inviting others to harm you. Caring about other people's well-being naturally follows that. Morality is part of basic causality and logic. Not caring about other people is basically madness.
Follow
@TerminalAutism @cee @ryo This is literally the non-aggression principle which is the heart of anarcho-capitalism. Okay, maybe "capitalism" is a dirty word and brings negative connotations. That's why some of us prefer the term "Voluntaryist". And like I said earlier, if you don't want to participate in the free market, you don't have to. You can live communally, or just be entirely self-reliant on a homestead in the middle of nowhere. It doesn't matter.
@cee@freethinkers.lgbt
@xianc78 @TerminalAutism @ryo Classical AnComs, Mutualists, AnCaps... all adopt natural law and human nature as a justification, but it's an empty figure of speech, even different schools of thought under ancoms/ancaps cant agree amongst themselves at times. The economics is fine, but the epistemology and ontology from the classicals is out-dated
@xianc78 @TerminalAutism @cee The reason why I continue to use anarcho-capitalism instead of voluntarianism is exactly because it pisses off the brainlets.
@ryo @xianc78 @cee Oh, that is a valid reason. If you want to piss off the brainlets, then invent your own joke ideology. Half a decade ago, I invented a joke system called a "libertarian dictatorship". It's a system that forces you to be free whether you want to or not.
In the libertarian dictatorship, there will be anti-cops going around giving people unfair orders, and arresting them if they obey, and if you get arrested, you are going to antiprison, a place where you will be forced to be free, and to not obey orders! It's an authoritarian state that is against authoritarianism and that arrests people for following the law.
The funniest thing about it is that you probably could push that and people that are into ideologies wouldn't see the obvious flaws in it, like, the government could just tell people not to do things and then they would have to. I don't know what the ism for this would be called. How about anarchofascism? That would make a lot of people very angry. It would rustle a lot of jimmies. If the name isn't taken already. Wouldn't surprise me.
In the libertarian dictatorship, there will be anti-cops going around giving people unfair orders, and arresting them if they obey, and if you get arrested, you are going to antiprison, a place where you will be forced to be free, and to not obey orders! It's an authoritarian state that is against authoritarianism and that arrests people for following the law.
The funniest thing about it is that you probably could push that and people that are into ideologies wouldn't see the obvious flaws in it, like, the government could just tell people not to do things and then they would have to. I don't know what the ism for this would be called. How about anarchofascism? That would make a lot of people very angry. It would rustle a lot of jimmies. If the name isn't taken already. Wouldn't surprise me.
@TerminalAutism @cee @xianc78 Except "anarcho-capitalism" isn't made up, it's just a peaceful anarchy with private property rights and entrepreneurship.
Not like "anarcho-communism" which adds so much bullshit to the mix like LGBT (rainbow terrorism), firey but mostly peaceful burning, looting, and murdering, and other irrelevant shit.
Though the one thing ancoms are admittingly better at than ancaps is technology, though when it comes to memes, ancaps clearly take the cake.
Not like "anarcho-communism" which adds so much bullshit to the mix like LGBT (rainbow terrorism), firey but mostly peaceful burning, looting, and murdering, and other irrelevant shit.
Though the one thing ancoms are admittingly better at than ancaps is technology, though when it comes to memes, ancaps clearly take the cake.
@ryo @TerminalAutism @cee @xianc78
Let's take the good parts from each ism, then we get Capsoccommunauthordarwinvoluntariananarcho-capicommunism, the best ism.
Let's take the good parts from each ism, then we get Capsoccommunauthordarwinvoluntariananarcho-capicommunism, the best ism.
@udon @ryo @cee @xianc78 It would be the best ism, but even then, it would still be inherently bad because isms make you less likely to think things that are outside of that ism, or opposite to it. As soon as you put a label on a set of ideas and start identifying with it, it becomes kinda impossible to be a reasonable human being. You can no longer consider ideas that are incompatible with that without considering abandoning the identity, which is now part of who you are and not so easy to get rid of. It turns the easy process of changing your mind about a single thing into a much harder process of changing your entire identity. That's the quick and short explanation of why ideologies are inherently bad. It just limits your ability to improve and to experiment with different ideas.
@TerminalAutism @udon @cee @xianc78 If all the isms are an ideology, then I guess racism is an ideology too now.
The best well known ideology yet.
NIIIIIIIIIIGGEEEEEEEERRRRR!!
The best well known ideology yet.
NIIIIIIIIIIGGEEEEEEEERRRRR!!
