@ryo The only problem I see with Tor or I2P is that Email, XMPP, Fediverse, etc servers will have to be configured to communicate with servers using those darknets which is going to break federation as not everyone will do it.

@xianc78 They'll only federate with those on the same darknet though.
But to be fair, did we even rely on normies to be on the clearnet for it to function back in the 1990's?

@ryo It's still a problem. There are many different darknets out there. Some instances will only support Tor. Others will only support I2P. Some will support both. It's going to be a huge mess.

@xianc78 @ryo

Why do you trust ((( TOR ))) it always seemed to be a honey pot
and it was started by ((( UNIVERSITIES ))) which have been anti white for a long time

Follow

@charliebrownau @ryo I know it had military origin. I do believe that I2P is superior and we should be using that instead, but people avoid it because the main implementation is written in Java, despite the fact that native implementations exist.

· · Web · 2 · 0 · 1

@xianc78 @ryo

Whats the proper version made with Pascal, C,C++ , FORTRAN, Assembler ?

@xianc78 @ryo

Thanks Ill check it out

Its 3:25am , i just woke up for some water , ill look at it later

@xianc78 @charliebrownau There is i2pd which is written in C++, but you must keep it up to date all the time in order for it to continue to function and not just segment fault after 3 or so hours every single time, and the devs barely even communicate about new releases (basically like dumping the megaphone, and resort to whispering instead).
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.