@lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
@xianc78 Well GNU has yet to have a kernel (Linux is from Torvalds, Mach is from Carnegie Mellon University) so why should I?
@lanodan Just write the userland and use the Linux kernel.
@lanodan @xianc78 this looks cool, although kernel "objects" ring a bad bell.
>A cspace is itself a capability which stores a (configurable) number of capability slots. Each task is associated with one cspace and invokes them by providing the index of the capability slot they wish to use as a 32-bit unsigned integer.
does this mean it has process isolation by design or are cspaces not isolated from other processes
>A cspace is itself a capability which stores a (configurable) number of capability slots. Each task is associated with one cspace and invokes them by providing the index of the capability slot they wish to use as a 32-bit unsigned integer.
does this mean it has process isolation by design or are cspaces not isolated from other processes
Amélia Bjórnsdottir/Ursidíno (she, they)
@lanodan GNU has a fork of Mach known as GNUMach, so we do have a kernel.
The Hurd is also a collection of servers that I really reckon makes up a larger kernel.
Is it the case that Linux has never used code that has been forked from other places?
Going by that logic, I really reckon a number of BSD's don't have their own kernel, as their kernel was forked from elsewhere.
GNU cat is better than the example source you showed - just based off the license. GPLv3-or-later is better than GPLv2-only or GPLv3-only.
It's also faster and quite short for all the speed and functionality now that I read it.
The Hurd is also a collection of servers that I really reckon makes up a larger kernel.
Is it the case that Linux has never used code that has been forked from other places?
Going by that logic, I really reckon a number of BSD's don't have their own kernel, as their kernel was forked from elsewhere.
GNU cat is better than the example source you showed - just based off the license. GPLv3-or-later is better than GPLv2-only or GPLv3-only.
It's also faster and quite short for all the speed and functionality now that I read it.
@Suiseiseki
> Going by that logic, I really reckon a number of BSD's don't have their own kernel, as their kernel was forked from elsewhere.
Modern BSD isn't a fork but a full reimplementation that's different enough to end the lawsuit with AT&T.
> just based off the license
I would suggest you stop being such an GNU pain-in-the-arse, muted, go away.
Go back to eating foot fungus.
> Going by that logic, I really reckon a number of BSD's don't have their own kernel, as their kernel was forked from elsewhere.
Modern BSD isn't a fork but a full reimplementation that's different enough to end the lawsuit with AT&T.
> just based off the license
I would suggest you stop being such an GNU pain-in-the-arse, muted, go away.
Go back to eating foot fungus.
