You sound like a lolbert, let me try to cram this into your head, the three things that matter is power, the will to use it, and the support of the people. Your weapons are useless if you are unwilling to use them, unwilling to kill and subdue those who threaten you, your family, and your people.
The different races are not your people as they do not share your values down to a genetic level, even if you accommodate them into your group, it will be surface value at best and an enemy saboteur at worse. This goes down to the very fundamental laws of nature itself, which anthill would be better off? A black only anthill (representing white people) or a black anthill with red ants in it (representing blacks and white intermixed). Obviously the monolithic society succeeds and is not marred with as much internal conflict.
Now to get into your perceived notion of dictatorships disarming their citizens, the dictatorships are arguably far more accountable to their citizens than “democracies and republics” are this is because they know that they have to conform and please to the culture of the people that they preside over. This is not the case in democracies and republics as it allows for varying party systems to conform instead to those who would sponsor them ex. Corporations, Super PAC’s and so forth. In this sense the parties do not represent the people or the initial values of a nation, rather whoever controls the money, which happens to be the jews and their banking systems. That is what led to the Weimar Republic and the parallels of the degeneracy there compared to the modern day western nations. Though it was not as bad there as it is today, back then Germany was nearly all white, where as today western nations are a cesspit of the most degenerate of races.
The reason why dictatorships succeed is because they are of a monolithic race, they care for their people and their founding principles as opposed to current western nations who merely can virtue signal to the lowest IQ of blacks with free handouts and they will vote for them.
RT: https://noagendasocial.com/users/Dan_Ramos/statuses/110308904065517157
The different races are not your people as they do not share your values down to a genetic level, even if you accommodate them into your group, it will be surface value at best and an enemy saboteur at worse. This goes down to the very fundamental laws of nature itself, which anthill would be better off? A black only anthill (representing white people) or a black anthill with red ants in it (representing blacks and white intermixed). Obviously the monolithic society succeeds and is not marred with as much internal conflict.
Now to get into your perceived notion of dictatorships disarming their citizens, the dictatorships are arguably far more accountable to their citizens than “democracies and republics” are this is because they know that they have to conform and please to the culture of the people that they preside over. This is not the case in democracies and republics as it allows for varying party systems to conform instead to those who would sponsor them ex. Corporations, Super PAC’s and so forth. In this sense the parties do not represent the people or the initial values of a nation, rather whoever controls the money, which happens to be the jews and their banking systems. That is what led to the Weimar Republic and the parallels of the degeneracy there compared to the modern day western nations. Though it was not as bad there as it is today, back then Germany was nearly all white, where as today western nations are a cesspit of the most degenerate of races.
The reason why dictatorships succeed is because they are of a monolithic race, they care for their people and their founding principles as opposed to current western nations who merely can virtue signal to the lowest IQ of blacks with free handouts and they will vote for them.
RT: https://noagendasocial.com/users/Dan_Ramos/statuses/110308904065517157
Follow
@KitlerIs6 @Dan_Ramos @William_The_Dragonborn Look up Hans Herman Hoppe and physical removal.
Hoppe literally just describes Fascism but impractical and with a hand tied behind your back because you couldn't give up your libertarian principles.
