@branman65 @RealRaul Everyone likes to be "total nigger death this", "total nigger death that", until it's time for some actual nigger death. It's all just a larp to you? Give me one good reason why it wouldn't be for the best of everyone if Shaniqua took a trip to Planned Parenthood.
@branman65 @RealRaul No, it's not. It's a clump of cells that will eventually grow into your demographical replacement at best and a dope-slinging career criminal that will stab your child to death for their sneakers at worst. They already breed like rabbits and you say you don't want to put a stop to that because 'we are all human beans' ? Get real.
@jetzkrieg @branman65 @RealRaul How many White children are you willing to have killed for each black killed?
@Godcast @branman65 @RealRaul Zero. What part of "what race is it?" did you not understand? That means illegal for white women, legal and even encouraged for non-whites.
@Godcast @branman65 @RealRaul >"What if we had race specific abortion laws."
>"But we don't have race specific abortions laws!"

...
@jetzkrieg @Godcast @RealRaul @branman65 Some people don't seem to understand that the laws can say whatever the fuck you want them to say.

@caekislove @branman65 @Godcast @jetzkrieg @RealRaul That's because there is only one true law and you don't need a state to enforce it.

@xianc78 @caekislove @branman65 @Godcast @jetzkrieg @RealRaul The NAP is fucking caved-in-head anti-social retard shit and you are also retarded.

@CatLord @caekislove @branman65 @Godcast @jetzkrieg @RealRaul The NAP is the logical conclusion that all forms of aggression outside of self-defense are unjustified. Ethics can be explained objectively using logic. Just watch this video if you want to know more.

invidious.poast.org/watch?v=1n

@xianc78 @caekislove @branman65 @Godcast @jetzkrieg @RealRaul Are you 16 years old? This is insipid, infantile rubbish. Libertarians always end up expanding the limits of the NAP everywhere because they constantly have to deal with social based challenges to it.
>what if my neighbour is polluting
>what if he is doing something disgusting in view of children but still on his property
>what if he is clearly planning aggression but hasn't realised it yet
Et cetera. The most compelling general formulation, to the average man, is this, however: What if he's an evil freak who deserves to die but skirts the bounds of the NAP in a legalistic fashion?

The answer to all of this is to abandon the NAP and accept natural human hierarchy, authority, moral imposition, and social regulation and the violence that comes with that. Contrary to what libertarians depict, this doesn't involve extreme repression and abuse. It's the natural state of man; people expect it and are happier this way.
damn it that’s offensive … when I was 16 I was a fascist 😤
exposure to reasons to become a fascist makes you one

world has been going downhill but the shits only really hit the fan (comparatively) recently
I personally do not wish death upon anyone

I honestly would be okay with partitioning off part of Canada or America as a “mixed race country” in which they can live undisturbed just so long as each “pure” race has its own ethnic home with rules against such activities
Follow

@d0c40r0 @caekislove @branman65 @CatLord @Godcast @jetzkrieg @RealRaul You can do that without statism. Look up Hans Herman Hoppe, covenant communities, and physical removal.

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0
statism is the easiest remedy, you cannot trust people to do it on their own as they will be at least somewhat influenced by those in power (currently jews) to do what they prefer
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.